The Rediff Special/ K P Nayar
Gujral finds himself at odds with the IFS over talks with Pakistan
Male revealed a deep divide between the prime minister and his foreign service over policy towards Pakistan.
Gohar Ayub Khan, Pakistan's foreign minister, has
done what his illustrious father could not. He has created the
most serious division within the Indian government in half a century
of dealing with Pakistan. Ranged against each other and taking
fundamentally divergent positions at the end of the Indo-Pakistan
summit in Male, in the Maldives, last week were the prime minister,
I K Gujral, and his foreign secretary, Salman Haider.
Fortunately for Gujral, the bon homie between the
Indian and Pakistani prime ministers and the euphoria over their
meeting swept under the carpet the unprecedented differences between
the political leadership and the civil service in the ministry
of external affairs on the vital issue of Pakistan.
For the Pakistanis, the summit meeting with India
went like clockwork, just as they had planned. And plan they did
to the last detail. Pakistan's foreign secretary, Shamshad Ahmad,
arrived at the venue of the summit with a folder which contained
talking points for the Pakistani prime minister, Nawaz Sharief,
with a difference. Ahmad's papers, on the basis of which he briefed
the press immediately after the summit, listed in detail and step
by step what Sharief had told Gujral.
What made the document curious, however, was that
it had all been written in the past tense, and written before
the Sharief-Gujral talks actually took place. The meeting between
the two prime ministers had gone just the way the Pakistanis wanted.
The differing ways in which India and Pakistan approached
the talks showed later in the day. When Haidar briefed the press
in the evening, he read out from a notebook in which he had made
notes while the talks were in progress. Sharief, it was clear to
all those who wanted to go beyond platitudes, had steered the
talks, set the agenda and was the master of the Male summit.
The Indian approach to the summit was reactive, not
proactive. No wonder then that Sharief confidently addressed the
press both before and after the summit while the Indian prime
minister was smuggled into the summit venue by his special protection
group, the media kept at bay.
For the lunch which Sharief hosted when the two prime
ministers met, the Pakistanis had taken elaborate care to find
out Gujral's culinary preferences. They altogether eschewed seafood,
to which the Indian prime minister is allergic, and avoided red
meat, which he dislikes.
Baingan Patiala, stuffed chicken breast served with
tomato almond sauce, bhindi do-piazza and vegetable samosas
-- all Gujral favourites -- probably lulled Gujral into the same complacent
mood in which he had, only a few days earlier, forgotten who had
ordered the refuelling of United States air force planes during
the Kuwait War. As Gujral recited Urdu couplets in absolute nostalgia
for his beloved Lahore, Sharief drove a hard bargain on the issue
of joint working groups with India.
When Gujral and Sharief jointly addressed the media
after their meeting, the Indian prime minister conceded that the
summit had resolved to address all outstanding issues between
India and Pakistan: a euphemism which implied that Kashmir had
been put on the agenda.
Within minutes thereafter, Pakistan's foreign secretary
briefed the media and he categorically said the two leaders had
agreed to set up a joint working group exclusively devoted to
Kashmir. This tied in with what Gujral had said in his brief comments
after the summit, although he did not elaborate on the joint working
group or, for that matter, go into any details about the talks.
When Haidar addressed the press in the evening, he
took a completely different line. He said the two prime ministers
had merely instructed their respective foreign secretaries to
meet and talk about what issues should be discussed bilaterally.
Haidar's attention was drawn to what Gujral had said earlier in
the day and to Ahmad's assertion that a joint working group on
Kashmir would soon be a reality. Flashing his famous temper, the
Indian foreign secretary snapped: "It is his (Ahmad's) preoccupation."
Kind Courtesy: The Telegraph
Tell us what you think of this report
|