The Rediff Special / Gurudas Dasgupta
'By opening up the insurance sector, we are making our economy vulnerable
to the insurance agents of the world'
The Communist Party of India has been in the forefront of the
national campaign to prevent the opening up of the insurance
sector to private and foreign companies. In this extract from a
recent speech in Parliament, CPI MP Gurudas
Dasgupta explains why his party is opposed to
reforms in the insurance business:
The question that arises is: Under whose authority and whose instruction
has there been a systematic move to clear the decks for induction
of private Indian and foreign companies into the insurance business?
The insurance sector was nationalised by an Act of Parliament by successive
doses of legislation, as in 1956 and as in 1971. Insurance sector
is not a mixed sector. It came under the domain of nationalised
companies because it was so decided by the parliament and the
government.
Now, the point is that this Act of Parliament which puts insurance
business under the domain of the nationalised sector is sought
to be devalued by the repeated pronouncements of the finance minister
with regard to giving permission for the opening up of offices
of foreign insurance companies and the public sector entering
into an arrangement with the foreign insurance companies.
Under whose authority is this Act of Parliament sought to be devalued?
If it is not a question of chaining the decision of Parliament,
it is, at least, a question of acting over the head of Parliament
because it is Parliament alone which can modify its earlier
decisions, which can change its earlier decisions. It can correct
the wrong that might have been done in 1956.
If Parliament had done any wrong by nationalising the entire
insurance sector in 1956, that wrong can be rectified only by
Parliament through another Act. Therefore, it seems as if this
move has been set in by people who are at the helm of the ministry
of finance. They have not been authorised by Parliament.
Let us not take protection under the cover of Common Minimum Programme.
When the CMP was signed -- let it be known once and for all -- a number
of political parties, including the party to which I belong and
including some of the political parties, could not agree with
it.
It was made very clear in the same meeting and subsequently the
same opinion was conveyed to the prime minister that we do not
want to forego our right to openly oppose or even take recourse
to vote against if a move is made to hand over, even partially,
the nationalised public sector to the multinationals.
The question, therefore, is: Why is the insurance sector being
thrown open? What is the reason behind it? Is it for money? Is
it for foreign exchange? Is it to get better technology? Or is
it to build up a competitive environment in the insurance sector?
If it is for money, how much of money have they already
promised the finance minister to put in?
How much of money? Is it several billions or several thousands
of millions? Whatever they might have promised, whatever funds
they may have decided to bring in, I would say, by opening up
the insurance sector, we are allowing them to have a free access
to larger investible funds and we are making our economy vulnerable
to the insurance agents of the world.
Secondly, if it is a question of technology, it is the computer
technology that is needed. If you do not have the required standard
of computers, then let us purchase them from the world market
though at a higher rate.
If it is a question of building up competitive environment in
the insurance sector, may I submit that the competition may lead
to cut-throat competition. It has happened in many parts of the
world. It may lead to colossal loss on the one hand and, on the
other, it may lead to unholy tie-ups between insurance companies
resulting in high cost insurance for a poor country like India.
Excessive competition in the insurance market, in different parts
of the world, especially, in the developed countries, has resulted
in erosion of commercial feasibility.
There has been an erosion in commercial feasibility in the insurance
market in most of the leading, advanced, capitalist countries
of the world. Because of the cut-throat competition, people look
for higher returns. Because of the higher returns, there has been
a move for high-risk investment. As a result of this, a large
number of insurance companies have slipped into insolvency.
Let us look at our own market. Let us look at marine insurance.
In marine insurance, our General Insurance Company has lost Rs
2 billion of premium collection because there was a reduction
in premium.
Marine insurance in the country has lost Rs 2 billion of premium
collection within seven days. This was because there was a reduction
in the payment of premium from 17 paise per hundred rupees assured
to one paise per hundred rupees assured.
|