|
|
|
|
Back
Next
The New York Times was not very kind to Living History. It called the book 'a mishmash of pious platitudes about policy' with 'robotic asides about her official duties in Washington'. Overall, it said, 'the book has the overprocessed taste of a stump speech, the calculated polish of a string of anecdotes to be delivered on a television chat show.'
|
|
|