The All India Football Federation on Tuesday said it will wait for the detailed judgement to decide its future course of action after its president Praful Patel's election last year was set aside by the Delhi high court for not following the National Sports Code.
The high court directed that fresh elections be conducted within a period of five months.
A bench of justices S Ravindra Bhat and Najmi Waziri also appointed former chief election commissioner S Y Quraishi as an administrator to look into the functioning of the AIFF.
"AIFF is not aware of the reasons of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court to pass this order. Once AIFF receives the copy of the Order from the Hon'ble High Court, AIFF will decide the course of action in accordance with the law," a statement from the AIFF said.
"AIFF is aware that earlier today the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi has pronounced its judgement in the matter which was earlier reserved on 12th May, 2017. AIFF understands that the Hon'ble court has to make certain corrections, after which the order would be made available to the parties. The Hon'ble High Court also directed to amend the AIFF Constitution to make it compliant with the National Sports Code," it added.
The AIFF said that the high court in its order dated December 15 last year had observed that the election ought to be conducted as per the applicable rules of the institution concerned and also in consonance with the National Sports Code and the elections guidelines contained with respect to conduct and eligibility conditions including age, tenure and restrictions.
"That the Hon'ble Court further vide the same order restrained AIFF from completing its election scheduled for 21st December, 2016. Immediately, AIFF had approached the Hon’ble High Court and filed a detailed affidavit to bring on record that AIFF has followed the Election process as prescribed under Sports Code, its Constitution as well FIFA & AFC statutes.
"AIFF also apprised the Hon'ble High Court that the Constitution of AIFF is in compliance with the terms of age limit, tenure limit of prime office bearers and one state-one vote policy. Accordingly, the Hon'ble Court allowed AIFF to proceed with elections vide its order 20th December 2016," it said.
Ther AIFF said it conducted its election under the supervision of a retired High Court Judge, who acted as the Returning Officer.
"AIFF is fully compliant with all statutory regulations in terms of the Registrar of Societies Act as well as other notifications and orders of the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports. The Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports also confirmed and verified in the past that that AIFF's election was in strict compliances with its Constitution and National Sports Code," the AIFF said.
"AIFF's election process is as per the FIFA and AFC statutes as well."
Patel, a former Union Minister, served as acting president of the AIFF for one year after long-time head Priya Ranjan Dasmunshi suffered a cardiac arrest in 2008. He took over as full time president in October 2009 before being re-elected for the top job in December 2012.
He was re-elected unopposed as AIFF president for his third successive term in December last year.
Delhi HC sets aside election of Praful Patel as AIFF president
The Delhi high court on Tuesday set aside the election of Praful Patel, who was last year elected as the president of All India Football Federation for a four-year term, his third successive tenure.
The court set aside the elections saying they were held without following the National Sports Code.
It also directed that fresh elections be conducted within a period of five months.
A bench of justices S Ravindra Bhat and Najmi Waziri also appointed former chief election commissioner (CEC) S Y Quraishi as an administrator to look into the functioning of the AIFF.
The court's order came on a plea by advocate Rahul Mehra contending that the elections of the federation were held contrary to the National Sports Code.
Patel, former civil aviation minister, was elected for the post in December last year along with the Executive Committee for the term 2017-2020 after the high court had vacated a stay on the elections.
