The clock on the ceasefire is running out. But everyone's already whispering about round two, possibly as soon as this weekend.
What began with airstrikes and killed leaders has settled into something slower and, in a way, more measurable: A test of who runs out of patience first, notes Prem Panicker in his must read blog on the Iran War.
US-Iran Ceasefire Tensions Rise
There is a kind of hush, The Carpenters sang back in the 1970s, and it feels like the world's theme song for this week.
Nothing significant is exploding on the Iran front. And that, strange as it seems, is the unsettling part.
It's been a little over six weeks since the US and Israel launched airstrikes that took out key Iranian leaders, hammered military sites, and left the navy licking its wounds.
The latest round of talks in Pakistan, mediated by army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, wrapped up last weekend without a breakthrough.
The clock on the ceasefire is running out. But everyone's already whispering about round two, possibly as soon as this weekend.
The signals are mixed, though. If Islamabad is to host round two, as projected, then Pakistan Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif heading off on a visit to Tehran and various Gulf capitals feels counter-intuitive.
The White House calls ongoing conversations 'productive and ongoing'.
Trump, chatting on Fox Business, insists the war is 'nearly over', while casually reminding everyone he could flatten every bridge and power plant in Iran in an hour.
Out in the Gulf, though, the screws are turning quietly but firmly. The US has effectively shut down Iran's maritime trade.
No tankers in or out of Iranian ports without turning back. In the first 48 hours, nine vessels complied and headed home.
Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is way below normal (external link).
Strait of Hormuz Disruption Deepens
Iran responded by shutting the Strait to everyone else, threatening to halt flows across the Gulf, Sea of Oman, and even into the Red Sea if the pressure continues.
China, which used to suck up over 80% of Iran's seaborne crude, is suddenly scrambling (external link).
The US Treasury has warned Chinese banks and killed some waivers. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called it the 'financial equivalent' of the earlier kinetic pounding.
Key Points
- Ceasefire between US, Israel and Iran remains fragile, with growing expectations of renewed conflict within days.
- US-led maritime pressure has sharply reduced Iranian oil exports, disrupting global shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
- Iran threatens wider retaliation by blocking regional waterways, escalating risks across Gulf, Red Sea and global energy markets.
- US domestic politics favour continued pressure, as Senate Republicans reject efforts to limit presidential war powers.
- Despite reduced military activity, economic warfare and sanctions have emerged as the primary battleground shaping the conflict.
Iran Oil Exports Under Pressure
Analysts figure Iran can keep pumping (external link) at around 3.5 million barrels per day for up to two months before storage forces real cuts.
Domestic refineries are already soaking up about 2 million bpd. But if this drags into May or beyond, production will have to drop hard.
The market's already jittery from over 12 million bpd of regional disruption.
Trump Gets Senate Backing
Back in the US, the Senate just handed Trump more leash.
Republicans blocked (external link) a Democratic push to rein in his war powers, voting 52-47 along mostly party lines.
It was the fourth such attempt since the strikes began. Only Rand Paul broke ranks on the GOP side.
The message is clear: Congress isn't rushing to tie the president's hands. Trump has the political runway, at least for now, to keep the pressure on.
Meanwhile, the human cost grinds on in the margins.
In Lebanon, Israeli strikes have turned parts of the south into rubble, creating a buffer zone that keeps families from burying their dead (external link) in ancestral lands.
In Nabatieh and beyond, mourners are forced to inter loved ones temporarily in Beirut because heading south is too dangerous.
One family lost a mother and brother in a Beirut strike; they identified the body by a tattoo after days of searching.
The cycle of destruction and rebuilding feels endless. And then there's the view from inside Iran, where the BBC's Lyse Doucet captured (external link) something harder to quantify than tanker counts or vote tallies.
Under this fragile ceasefire, which has less than a week left, people are taking it one day at a time.
Almond trees are blooming, traffic is moving again on the highways, but there's a quiet apprehension in the air.
An elderly woman murmurs it's all in God's hands. A young woman in a red puffer jacket says outright the ceasefire won't hold, citing Iran's grip on the strait.
Bare-headed women still push back against the old modesty rules, in lingering echoes of the Woman Life Freedom protests.
Blockade Emerges as New Front
Sanctions bite, yet Tehran isn't blinking.
Many wonder if a real deal with the US is even possible, given the gaps: America wants a long nuclear freeze and dismantled capabilities; Iran offers a shorter pause and demands sanctions relief plus an end to the Lebanon campaign.
This is the eerie part. The guns have mostly fallen silent for now, but the blockade is the new front: Economic warfare dressed up as diplomacy's enforcer.
Talks may resume, a truce extension might happen, but the underlying mistrust runs deep.
Iran threatens broader retaliation if pushed too far. Trump keeps the big stick visible. And ordinary people on both sides -- Lebanese families unable to mourn properly, Iranians driving around bomb craters while hoping for normalcy -- pay the quiet price.
We're in the epicentre of a storm that hasn't broken yet.
The calm feels ominous precisely because everyone knows how quickly it can turn.
The question is what breaks first when the pressure doesn't work.
The troops keep coming
The Pentagon is sending thousands more into the Middle East even as mediators push for a ceasefire extension -- the USS George H W Bush rounding the Cape of Good Hope, the Boxer Amphibious Ready Group departing Hawaii, ground operation scenarios quietly being war-gamed.
Dan Lamothe's report is essential on what 'more options' actually means when the options include seizing Kharg Island or landing Marines on Iranian soil.
The retired admiral quoted here puts it plainly: A prolonged blockade is a tall order; any of the ground scenarios are significantly riskier. [Dan Lamothe, Washington Post (external link)]
The dinner that revealed the gap
Over spinach soup, scallops, and Diet Coke at the White House, Trump told the Dutch king he wants a swift end to the war.
The Dutch prime minister told Trump that Europe would help secure Hormuz, but only after the fighting stops. 'We agree to disagree,' said the PM afterward.
The meal is a perfect miniature of the wider diplomatic problem: Everyone wants the Strait open, nobody wants to be seen helping Trump get there.
The promised list of countries joining the blockade has not materialised. [Gramer, Bergengruen, McGraw, Wall Street Journal via Mint (external link)]
The outlines of a deal, and why they're deceptive
The Economist lays out what a negotiated end looks like: Reopen the Strait first, then work the nuclear details. But each step is harder than it sounds.
Iran could dilute its enriched uranium stockpile, or forswear enrichment for a limited period, or enrich as part of a consortium.
The US could lift sanctions in stages. But neither side trusts the other to honour its part, and both want to perform total victory at the table to compensate for the battlefield stalemate.
The piece is cold-eyed about the gap between available compromises and the political will to take them. [The Economist (external link)]
The $6 trillion collateral damage
Gulf sovereign wealth funds -- Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar -- were built to plan for life after oil. The war is forcing them to rebuild the old economy instead.
Iranian strikes have destroyed an estimated $25 billion in regional oil and gas infrastructure.
The pharaonic projects -- The Line, Trojena, the Mukaab cube in Riyadh -- are stalling or being quietly cancelled.
Foreign contractors are retreating, Western investors are getting cold feet, and luxury hotel occupancy across the Gulf is falling every week.
The funds are not rushing for the exits, but their attention is shifting from risky bets on the future to assets that generate cash now. [The Economist (external link)]
The flailing president
Jonathan Lemire's Atlantic piece is the most comprehensive account yet of how badly the Iran war has gone for Trump politically, and how it's cascading.
The Venezuela raid in January convinced Trump that military force was an unstoppable instrument. Iran taught him otherwise.
Iran didn't surrender, thirteen American troops have been killed, the Strait is more firmly in Tehran's hands than before the war began, and Trump's usual intimidation tactics -- deadlines, threats, social media blitzes -- have made him look weaker each time they pass without consequence.
Meanwhile: Orbán lost, the pope is fighting back, and Melania unpromptedly invoked Epstein. Some of Trump's own advisers, Lemire reports, are describing the president as flailing. [Jonathan Lemire, The Atlantic (external link)]
Law of unintended consequences:
World Cup euphoria collides head on with economic and geopolitical realities. US hotels are cutting room rates as expected fan inflows fail to materialise.
High ticket prices, inflation jitters, visa frictions and geopolitical tensions, including the Iran war, are cooling international travel, leaving hoteliers with unsold inventory and deflated expectations. [Financial Times (external link); Sports Illustrated (external link)]
What Israelis actually want
Polling expert Dahlia Scheindlin tells the New Yorker that only about a third of Israelis support the ceasefire, and even that support is driven primarily by Arab citizens.
The Jewish Israeli consensus, which started the war above ninety per cent, has softened but remains overwhelmingly against stopping.
The reason is not that Israelis think the war is going well. They don't. It's that decades of delegitimising diplomacy have left a political culture with no mental model for achieving security aims other than force.
Netanyahu's bind: The war didn't achieve its stated goals, but the only constituency for an alternative path doesn't yet have a leader willing to articulate one. [Isaac Chotiner, The New Yorker (external link)]
The EU's strange staying power:
A decade into the age of nationalism, leaving the EU remains remarkably taboo.
Janan Ganesh notes that the dominoes Brexit-era Leavers predicted would fall have not fallen. He asks why, and answers himself: Brexit, Trump, and Russia keep doing Brussels unsolicited favours.
Marine Le Pen softened on Europe to stay electorally competitive. Meloni mostly co-operated with the bloc. And Orbán's defeat this week was partly driven by Hungarian voters wanting back into Europe's good graces.
The piece is a useful corrective to the assumption that the global nationalist wave is structurally irreversible. [Financial Times (external link)]
In passing...
The blockade is the war, now. What began with airstrikes and killed leaders has settled into something slower and, in a way, more measurable: A test of who runs out of patience first.
Iran is sitting on favourable geography no executive order can redraw. Trump is sitting on poll numbers that keep moving in the wrong direction.
The ceasefire expires April 22. Talks may resume in Islamabad. Vance is on standby.
All of these are indications of two sides looking for an exit that neither can afford to call a retreat.
The quiet this week is the sound of pressure building in a system with no obvious release valve.
Photographs curated by Manisha Kotian/Rediff
Feature Presentation: Ashish Narsale/Rediff
© 2026