2G scam: How Raja indicted PM, Chidambaram

Defending himself against corruption charges in 2G scam, the 47-year-old Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam member of Parliament also submitted before Special Central Bureau of Investigation Judge O P Saini that there was nothing wrong in his decision of not auctioning 2G spectrum and that he was merely following the policies pursued by his predecessors and the National Democratic Alliance government.

"I have implemented only what I have inherited," he said.

...

Arguing that the sale of equity was not sale of licence, Raja said he cannot be accused of corruption in the controversial 2G spectrum allocation.

"The matter (about sale of equity by spectrum licencees) was discussed between the prime minister and the then finance minister P Chidambaram.

The then finance minister (who is now home minister) had said in front of the prime minister that dilution of shares does not amount to sale of 2G licence as per the corporate law," asserted Raja, who even said "Let the Prime Minister deny this."

Raja said if he is being prosecuted for following a certain policy then all telecom ministers since 1993 are liable to be prosecuted and should be in jail along with him as they too followed the same policy.

"If policy pursued by me was wrong, then all former telecom ministers since 1993 should also be in jail with me (Raja)," he said while opposing framing of charges against him.

On the action by his predecessors, Raja said, "Telecom Minister Arun Shourie distributed 26 licences while Dayanidhi Maran distributed 25 and I (Raja) distributed 122 licences. Numbers make no difference, however, it is to be noted that none of them auctioned the spectrum.

Raja also argued that sale of equity by way of UAS licence can be made directly to a company or to its holding company.

"The CBI, however, is maintaining that when DB Realty gave its shares (in Swan Telecom) to bring in money, it amounted to sale and so is the case with Unitech (Wireless). But, when Tata Tele services give its shares to bring in FDI, it, according to the CBI, does not amount to sale," Raja contended.

Unitech sold 67 per cent equity for Rs 6,120 crore whereas Tata Tele Services got Rs 13,973 crore by selling only 27 per cent equity, he said, adding that even then Tata was not accused by the CBI of committing any offence.

"Who is a better businessman -- Sanjay Chandra of Unitech or Ratan Tata of Tata Tele Services? And then they say we kept them (Tata) out of Delhi circle," Raja said.

Nowhere in the entire transaction has Sanjay Chandra been named as a conspirator, argued Raja. "It is just that a shade of suspicion by way of a loan transaction has been planted by the CBI in respect of Sanjay Chandra. The only sin of DB Realty and Unitech, who are actually realty eagles and developers, is that they have got good contacts and brought money from abroad," he added.

"S Tel also earned Rs 2,230 crore by diluting its shares but that was not considered as sale by the CBI then why only Unitech Wireless and Swan Telecom are caught," he said.

While defending his policy as telecom minister, Raja submitted that it is because of his policy that mobile phone call rates came down and they became affordable to even a 'rickshawala'.

"It was my obligation to social justice that every man on the street should have a mobile phone. I am a servant of my people and I made the call rates of mobile phone so cheap that even a 'rickshawwala' or a maid servant can be seen using it," Raja said

Raja, who was arrested on February 2 for his alleged role in the 2G scam, today began his arguments opposing charges of cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy against him. The CBI has estimated that there was a loss of Rs 30,000 crore to the state exchequer due to Raja's 2G policy.

The CBI had begun its arguments on framing of charges against Raja and 16 others, including three telecom firms, from July 21 and had completed its arguments on July 23.

All the 14 accused including DMK MP Kanimozhi are presently lodged in Tihar Jail.