Why is IAF splashing around cash on replacing Avros?

The Indian Air Force is wasting crores of Rupees on replacing the Avro-748, which has been a bits-and-pieces aircraft without any real operational role, says Ajai Shukla

With no discernible hand at the tiller, the defence ministry seems directionless and inept.

The caretaker minister, Arun Jaitley, appears to have neither the time nor the experience to chart a bold, new direction.

For more defence news, ...

Former Defence Minister A K Antony told Parliament in 2012 that this aimed to "encourage development of the Indian private sector in aircraft manufacture".

His blunt-speaking Indian Air Force chief then, N A K Browne, said the aim was to develop a competitor to Hindustan Aeronautics Limited.

The international vendor that wins the Avro-replacement tender must choose an Indian private company to build 40 aircraft, while delivering the first 16 off-the-shelf, all within eight years.

The favoured contenders are European multinational Airbus Defence and Space, Antonov of Ukraine and Alenia Aeromacchi, all of which have aircraft that meet India's specifications. The Tatas, Larsen & Toubro or the Mahindras could be chosen as the "Indian Production Agency".

Indigenisation is laudable, but this project has downsides that the defence ministry has ignored.

First, the Air Force is wasting Rs 14,000 crore on replacing the Avro-748, which has been a bits-and-pieces aircraft without any real operational role.

Secondly, the production agency would incur exorbitant costs for a new production line, airfield and ancillary infrastructure that cannot possibly be amortised over 40 mid-sized aircraft.

Thirdly, the Avro-replacement programme duplicates two indigenous programmes already under way to develop transport aircraft.

Please ...

Ask IAF officers why the Avro-748 was bought and you will hear an embarrassed clearing of throats.

It is a "staff communications and light logistics" aircraft, which means ferrying around senior officers, not destroying the enemy.

Today, the IAF's Avros mainly transport air marshals; six Avros in the Communications Squadron flew senior VIPs before plush executive jets arrived in recent years.

Yet, the IAF wants the passenger-carrying Avro replaced by a transport aircraft with a rear-loading ramp.

Senior Air Force officers admit the purchase is hard to justify, except as a means of developing a private sector alternative to HAL.

That is acceptable but the cost is worrying.

Besides the cost of technology, of developing aerospace suppliers and building an assembly line, the vendor would spend another Rs 1,000-1,500 crore on an airport near the assembly line.

Then there is the cost of testing and certification to international standards, essential for aircraft that might be exported or operated in a civilian environment.

Please ...

The defence ministry counters that the production run could be much larger -- besides the initial Air Force order for 40 aircraft, commercial airlines will snap up the Avro-replacement for non-metro sectors.

Such optimism overlooks rival projects that target the same market.

The National Aerospace Laboratory -- which functions under the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research -- is collaborating with HAL to develop a 70-90-seat regional transport aircraft by 2022.

With some 450 airstrips in India, the HAL-NAL expects to build 400 RTA.

Eleven vendors have responded to a request for information, and HAL announced at the Farnborough Airshow last week that it would soon tender for an engine for the RTA.

Simultaneously, HAL is partnering Russia's United Aircraft Corporation in a $600-million (Rs 3,600-crore) project to co-develop a Multirole Transport Aircraft.

The Indo-Russian agreement visualises the building of 205 MTA, of which Russia will take 100, India will buy 45, and 60 are slated for the export market.

The MTA may eventually replace the IAF's ageing Antonov AN-32, which have been flying since the 1980s.

Instead of introducing a third project into the mix (albeit involving manufacture, not development), the defence ministry must integrate these three efforts, avoiding the duplication of effort and expense. 

Please ...

The instrument already exists -- the National Aeronautics Coordination Group that was set up last year to coordinate national aerospace development.

Chaired by the secretary (defence production), this high-powered body includes the secretaries of civil aviation and science and technology; the chief of the Defence Research and Development Organisation; chiefs of HAL and NAL; military representatives; and the National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council.

If the aim of the Avro-replacement project is to develop an alternative to HAL, the defence ministry must midwife the process, not burden private-sector entrants with huge infrastructure expenses.

The tried-and-tested government-owned-company-operated, or GOCO, model must be activated, with private-sector companies encouraged to establish integration facilities at Air Force base repair depots, which already have airfields, such as those at Coimbatore and Kanpur.

They could be granted access to airfield facilities on a long-term lease, or on a pay-per-use basis.

Last year, Vijay Kelkar chaired a CSIR committee at the instance of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, evolving excellent suggestions for creating an aerospace ecosystem in the context of the RTA.

The report, which predictably remains classified, examines the issues holistically, as the defence ministry should do.

It offers solutions for synergising the function of Directorate General of Civil Aviation, creating an agency for aerospace certification and for sharing development risk, which is a major concern for private companies in aerospace design and production.

The defence ministry must succeed in creating competition in aerospace design and manufacture.

For that, the new defence minister must go deeper into issues rather than merely splashing around the cash.