News APP

NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  gplay

This article was first published 6 years ago
Home  » News » Sirisena suspends parliament till Nov 16 as political crisis deepens in Lanka

Sirisena suspends parliament till Nov 16 as political crisis deepens in Lanka

Source: PTI
Last updated on: October 27, 2018 14:11 IST
Get Rediff News in your Inbox:

Sri Lanka President Maithripala Sirisena on Saturday suspended parliament till November 16 after sacked Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe sought an emergency session to prove his majority, deepening the political crisis in the island nation.

IMAGE: Sri Lanka President Maithripala Sirisena's move to suspended parliament till November 16 is seen as an effort to allow former strongman Mahinda Rajapaksa to buy more time to seek majority. Photograph: Kirill Kudryavtsev/Pool/Reuters

Sirisena’s move is seen as an effort to allow former strongman Mahinda Rajapaksa to buy more time to seek majority in the parliament.

Rajapaksa and Sirisena combine has only 95 seats and is short of a simple majority in the 225-member house. Wickremesinghe’s United National Party has 106 seats on its own with just seven short of the majority.

The UNP claimed that President Sirisena sought to prorogue the parliament as Rajapaksa did not command a majority in the House.

Parliamentary officials said the president prorogued the house till November 16. The parliament was earlier due to meet on November 5 to unveil the 2019 annual budget.

The move to suspend the parliament came in the wake of an urgent request from Wickremesinghe to convene an emergency session of the house.

Wickremesinghe has been asserting that the swearing in of Rajapaksa in his place is “illegal and unconstitutional”.

Wickremesinghe, addressing the media along with his constituent party leaders, said, “This is a created crisis, there is no need for this crisis. The people must not suffer because of this at a difficult time for them.”

He said that the crisis could be resolved with no difficulty if the parliament was convened. “I can prove majority on the floor of the House,” Wickremesinghe said.

The UNP supporters protested outside Temple Trees against the decision taken by the president to sack Wickremesinghe.

Sirisena on Saturday formalised the sacking of his former ally by issuing two extraordinary gazette notices.

First notice was on Wickremesinghe being removed as prime minister and the other on the appointment of Rajapaska as the new premier.

IMAGE: Ranil Wickremesinghe, reacting to his removal as Sri Lanka's PM, said he would continue to be the prime minister till he enjoys the majority in Parliament. Photograph: Dinuka Liyanawatte/Reuters

Sirisena also ordered the removal of Prime Minister’s Secretary Saman Ekanayake.

The prime minister’s secretary has been removed according to the powers vested with the president as the appointing authority.

Responding to Sirisena in writing, Wickremesinghe said he is still the “constitutionally appointed prime minister” of Sri Lanka. “I write to inform you that I am the constitutionally appointed Prime Minister of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka and continue in that office and that I command the confidence of Parliament as contemplated in article 42(4) of the constitution,” the letter said.

Lankan President Sirisena in the letter Wickremesinghe had formally informed that the latter has been sacked from the prime minister's position.

Sirisena informed Wickremesinghe that he had been sacked from the position according to article 42(4) of the constitution.

Rauff Hakeem the leader of the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress said his party would firmly back Wickremesinghe.

Two other constituent party leader from minority Tamil and Muslim parties, Mano Ganesan, Palani Digambaram and Rishath Bathiyutheen also said they would be firmly in support of Wickremesinghe and called Sirisena’s move to sack Wickremesinghe as illegal and unconstitutional.

The United Nations resolutions passed under the former regime of Rajapaksa was co-sponsored by Wickremesinghe’s government pledging to deliver justice to Tamil victims of the separatist war launched by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

Sirisena’s sacking of Wickremesinghe was the culmination of an year of bitter relations between them on several policy matters. The president has been critical of the prime Minister and his policies, especially on economy and security.

In April, Wickremesinghe successfully defeated a no trust motion in parliament engineered by Sirisena with backing from Rajapaksa.

The UNP, however, suffered one defection after Rajapaksa was sworn in with Ananda Aluthgamage meeting the former president and extending him support.

The political developments unfolded after Sirisena’s broader political front United People’s Freedom Alliance announced that it has decided to quit the current unity government with Wickremesinghe's UNP.

The unity government was formed in 2015 when Sirisena was elected president with Wickremesinghe’s support, ending a nearly decade-long rule by Rajapaksa.

Rajapaksa’s return to power ends a more than three-year-old coalition government that was formed by Sirisena and Wickremesinghe on a promise to combat corruption and financial irregularities.

The unity government was thrown into a crisis after Rajapaksa’s new party pulled off a stunning victory in local elections in February seen as a referendum on the ruling alliance.

Sri Lanka nearly faced economic sanctions from the West over Rajapakse’s brutal military crackdown on the banned Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

The LTTE sought a separate Tamil homeland in the northern and eastern provinces of the island nation for nearly 30 years before its collapse in 2009 after the Sri Lankan Army killed its supreme leader Velupillai Prabhakaran.

Rajapaksa and his family are facing several cases of corruption and financial irregularities. 

Get Rediff News in your Inbox:
Source: PTI© Copyright 2024 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.