News APP

NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  gplay

This article was first published 9 years ago
Home  » News » Why didn't Pakistan raise Kashmir at Ufa, asks Rajnath Singh

Why didn't Pakistan raise Kashmir at Ufa, asks Rajnath Singh

Source: PTI
Last updated on: August 23, 2015 18:11 IST
Get Rediff News in your Inbox:

Hitting out at Pakistan a day after it called off the Indo-Pak National Security Advisor-level talks, Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh on Sunday said if Pakistan was so keen on raising the Kashmir issue, why didn’t it do so during talks in Ufa even as the Modi government came under fire from Congress for its “ham-handed” handling of the situation.

Accusing Pakistan of deviating from the agenda agreed in Ufa between Prime Ministers Narendra Modi and Nawaz Sharif, Singh also made it clear that the possibility of any future dialogue will depend on the neighbour.

On Pakistan’s claim that Kashmir was the main agenda, the home minister said, “Why didn’t Pakistan raise the Kashmir issue in Ufa in Russia when the two PMs met last month? Why was it not decided earlier that it would be part of NSA-level talks? It was never an issue on agenda.”

Describing the cancellation of talks as unfortunate, he however, underlined that India stands for dialogue and cordial relationship with Pakistan.

“The cancellation of NSA-level talks between India and Pakistan is unfortunate. India is in favour of dialogue,” Singh told reporters on the sidelines of a function.

Pakistan on Saturday night called off the talks in Delhi between National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and his Pakistani counterpart Sartaj Aziz, hours after India made it clear that discussions on Kashmir and a meeting with separatists will not be acceptable to it.

Congress lashed out at government’s “ham handling” of talks and accused it of playing into Pakistan’s hands, claiming that India has lost out on all the gains of last 10 years.

“Unfortunately, the National Democratic Alliance government has played into Pakistan’s hands by being imprecise, by being unprepared, by lacking focus, by being ad hoc, by not doing sufficient hard-nosed groundwork, good old-fashioned diplomacy and preparation.

“We are very sad that all the gains of the last 10-odd years on Indo-Pak settlement of atleast some issues, are given a setback by such aborted talks. No such opportunity should have been given to Pakistan to wriggle out of as serious an issue as terror,” Congress spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi said.

“We deprecate the ham-handed manner in which several aspects have been handled by the government,” he said.

“I think the government needs to get its house in order. It needs to make sure that multiple agencies which suddenly appear to have started making Indian foreign policy, either the multiplicity is eliminated or complete unity and coherence is introduced in all those multiple agencies to speak through one agency and in one voice,” Singhvi said.

Attacking Pakistan, he said it is clear that it wants to run away from all issues relating to terrorism as it does not want any discussion on any issue or exchange of information, particularly on those serious matters on which it can be cornered.

In Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mufti Mohammed Sayeed expressed disappointment over the cancellation of NSA talks and hoped that “the break in talks would be temporary”.

The chief minister had a veiled advice for Pakistan and separatists, saying, “It is neither warranted nor desirable to insist upon all-inclusive participation, directly or indirectly, in each and every bilateral meeting, like that between the two NSAs.”

Hoping that India and Pakistan will “re-engage soon in a meaningful dialogue” and steps taken by New Delhi to remove impediments in normalisation of relations will be reciprocated by Islamabad, Sayeed said he wants to see both the countries “walk the bridge of trust together”.

Asked about Pakistan blaming India for cancellation of talks, the home minister shot back, “It is Pakistan which has cancelled the talks and not India.”

He said that India has always stood for maintaining good and cordial relationship with its neighbours and efforts in this direction would continue. “But Pakistan should not have deviated from the agenda decided during the meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif (in Ufa in July),” he said.

On Pakistan’s criticism of India’s objections to Aziz’s meeting with Kashmiri separatist leaders, Singh said, “The thing was that there will be no third party in NSA-level talks. It was only NSA-level talk. There was nothing like that others too will hold talks before, later or in between.”

The Union Minister said Pakistan should have held talks as per pre-decided agenda on terror.

Asked about possibility of any dialogue in future, Singh said, “go and ask Pakistan, how can I reply to it.”

On being asked about the next step of India, the home minister said it was up to Pakistan to decide.

“As far as India’s intention is concerned, I want to make it clear that it is in favour of having good and cordial relationship with its neighbour,” he said.

Image: A sand sculpture depicting India and Pakistan ties after the NSA-level talks were cancelled. Photograph: PTI

Get Rediff News in your Inbox:
Source: PTI© Copyright 2024 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.