rediff.com
rediff.com
News
      HOME | NEWS | PTI | REPORT
November 9, 2001
1745 IST

NEWSLINKS
US EDITION
SOUTH ASIA
COLUMNISTS
DIARY
SPECIALS
INTERVIEWS
CAPITAL BUZZ
REDIFF POLL
THE STATES
ELECTIONS
ARCHIVES
SEARCH REDIFF



 Deals for NRIs

 CALL INDIA
 Direct Service :
 29.9¢/min
 Pre-paid Cards :
 34.9¢/min


 India Abroad
Weekly Newspaper

  In-depth news

  Community Focus

  16 Page Magazine
For 4 free issues
Click here!

 Search the Internet
         Tips

E-Mail this report to a friend
Print this page Best Printed on HP Laserjets

SC admits Maneka's plea against Khushwant's book

A day after Union Minister of State for Culture Maneka Gandhi won a legal battle against British writer Katherine Frank, her petition against Khushwant Singh's autobiography Truth, Love and a Little Malice was admitted by the Supreme Court, but she did not press for stay of its publication.

The petition challenging the Delhi high court's order allowing Singh to publish the book was admitted and notices issued by a bench comprising Justice U C Banerjee and Justice Y K Sabharwal after hearing Gandhi's counsel Raj Panjawani and Singh's counsel Sridhar Chitale, who had filed a caveat.

Panjawani contended that there were several "defamatory and derogatory references to her and her family" in the book, extracts of which were first published in a magazine in October 1995.

Gandhi had filed a petition in the high court in December 1995 seeking an injunction against the author and publisher from publishing the book on the grounds that the statements made in it were false and even if correct violated her right to privacy. She had also sought damages.

A single judge of the high court had granted an ex-parte order restraining the respondents from publishing the book. The ex-parte order was confirmed on April 29, 1997.

Singh appealed against the single judge's order before a division bench, which declined to vacate the stay order. But on September 18, 2001, the bench quashed the injunction granted by the single judge, holding that "well-established principles weigh in favour of the right of publication".

The high court bench said there was no question of any irreparable loss or injury being caused since the respondent herself had also claimed damages, which would be the remedy in case she was able to establish defamation.

Allowing the appeal and imposing a cost of Rs 10,000 on Gandhi, the high court bench had ordered that the suit for damages would continue uninfluenced by the observations made in their order.

In her appeal to the Supreme Court, Gandhi asked whether the high court was justified in holding that the statements attributed to her and to members of her family, even if true, did not violate her right to privacy.

PTI

EARLIER REPORTS:
Maneka wins case against Indira's biographer
Khushwant permitted to publish autobiography
Court asks Khushwant not to write on Maneka

Back to top
(c) Copyright 2001 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Tell us what you think of this report

ADVERTISEMENT      
NEWS | MONEY | SPORTS | MOVIES | CHAT | CRICKET | SEARCH | RAIL/AIR | NEWSLINKS
ASTROLOGY | BROADBAND | CONTESTS | E-CARDS | ROMANCE | WOMEN | WEDDING
SHOPPING | BOOKS | MUSIC | PERSONAL HOMEPAGES | FREE EMAIL| MESSENGER | FEEDBACK