|
|
|
|
| HOME | NEWS | REPORT | |||
|
May 13, 1998
ELECTIONS '98
|
Chintamani MahapatraUS winking at Chinese arms sales led forced India's hand
After 24 four years of nuclear ambivalence, the
Bharatiya Janata Party-led coalition government in
India finally conducted three nuclear tests at the
Pokhran test cites and announced that India had nuclear
deterrent capability.
While it is difficult to identify people who are
really unhappy about this event in India, international reaction has been critical. The United States is "deeply disappointed,"
France is concerned, Britain has expressed its desire to take the
issue to the European Union, Japan has announced its decision to
reconsider the ODA (Official Development Assistance) to India, Pakistan is
enraged, and the United Nations Secretary General has "regretted" the
conduct of nuclear tests by India. Australia and New Zealand have recalled their envoys for consultations in protest against the Indian action.
China, significantly, has kept a low profile. When Buddha smiled for
the second time, why did Beijing maintain silence? Was it because,
China remains
unaffected by the event? In fact, China happens to be one of
the important actor inducing India to exercise its nuclear option. First
of all, the Sino-Pakistan cooperation in nuclear and missile development
programmes have been going on for several years and the international
community has conveniently overlooked the fact. Pakistan's nuclear
weapons programme and missile development are not considered to be detrimental to their national security interests by the G-7 countries. And China's rapid
economic performance has been too attractive for those countries to
annoy China on the ground of proliferation concerns. While trumpeting the
cause of human rights, the G-7 countries have been competing with one
another to win contracts in China. The United States and the two nuclear
weapon powers of Europe -- Britain and France -- are committed to
defending NATO area, Japan feels secure under the US
nuclear umbrella, and Russia,
notwithstanding its economic woes, is the second most militarily powerful
country in the world. Pakistan is an ally of China. And hence, it is India
which has to be careful about the uncertain evolution of China.
While the Americans, Europeans and the Japanese are engaged
in a trade and investment race, the Chinese have taken advantage of this
development by
shopping high technology items to modernise their nuclear
and missile arsenals. In the backdrop of series of US intelligence
reports about Chinese nuclear and missile assistance to Pakistan and
others, the Clinton Administration decided to implement the dormant 1985 nuclear cooperation agreement between the United States and China.
A recent CIA report about the persistent Chinese support to Pakistan's WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) programme during the second half
of 1996, was endorsed by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Robert Einhorn in his testimony to the Senate Governmental Affairs Subcommittee in April 1997. Einhorn said that Beijing had not stopped its cooperation in such field with Pakistan.
In September 1997, the Chinese President Jiang Zemin held a
summit meeting with Bill Clinton in Washington. A few months later, in
January this year, Clinton gave a certification to the US Congress that China
is no longer a proliferation promoter and in March this year, the nuclear
cooperation agreement between the US and China went into effect. Less
than a month later, Pakistan test-fired the so-called Ghauri missile, once
again bringing to light Sino-Pakistan cooperation in nuclear and
missile development programmes.
While the Clinton Administration has reportedly imposed some
token sanctions against Pakistan, China is still off the hook. On
the contrary, the US government is making all kinds of
compromises with China to make US president Bill Clinton's
trip to China in June a success. India's missile development programme as well as the latest
round of nuclear tests should be read in the backdrop of all these developments.
What will be the implications of these tests on Indo-US
relations? There is little doubt that the Clinton Administration will be
under pressure to impose sanctions against India under
the provisions of the Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Act of
1994. Section 102 of this act deals with
"nuclear processing transfers, illegal exports for nuclear
explosive
devices, transfer of nuclear explosive devices and nuclear
detonations." Any non-nuclear weapon state
can come under sanctions if it either
"receives a nuclear explosive device, or detonates a nuclear
explosive
device."
While India has detonated three nuclear explosive
devices, is it
a non-nuclear weapon state? According to this act, the
definition of the
non-nuclear weapon state is same as the one provided in
Article IX of the
NPT. India is clearly a non-nuclear weapon state according to
this
definition. But India is not a signatory to the NPT and can
claim that its
status has all along been different, particularly since 1974
Pokhran
nuclear test.
However, the Clinton Administration can delay imposition of
sanctions for about 30 days on the ground that "imposition of sanctions
on that country would be detrimental to the national security of the United
States." He can also waive the sanctions, if imposed, on the ground that
such sanction "would be prejudicial to the achievement of United States
nonproliferation objectives or otherwise jeopardise the common defence and
security."
Imposition of sanctions or lifting of sanctions thus would
ultimately be a political decision. The Clinton Administration
would have to assess the benefits of Indo-US ties which have been improving fast in the post-Cold
War era. Even in the field of promoting non-proliferation,
India's
contribution is no less. While it is true that India's
nuclear tests would
not go down well several throats after the indefinite
extension of the NPT
and the signing of the CTBT, it is also true that the
process of arms
control has almost halted since the Clinton Administration
assumed
office. No new initiative has been taken in the area of arms
control, old
agreements signed during the Reagan and the Bush
Administrations are facing
problems of implementation, the five nuclear powers continue
to possess
thousands of nuclear weapons and their delivery systems and
all five of
them believe in the value of nuclear deterrence.
Soon after the test, India announced its desire to
participate in arms
control and disarmament efforts. If invited, New Delhi can
contribute to
the cause of arms control and non-proliferation from the
position of
strength. More than China, India has been championing the
cause of the
developing world. And it will continue to do so. Before
imposing
sanctions, the Clinton Administration should weigh the pros
and cons. In
the process of seeking to punish India, it should not
promoting
proliferation by default.
Dr Chintamani Mahapatra is a fellow at the Institute for Defence
Studies and Analyses, New Delhi.
|
|
HOME |
NEWS |
BUSINESS |
CRICKET |
MOVIES |
CHAT
INFOTECH | TRAVEL | LIFE/STYLE | FREEDOM | FEEDBACK |
|