Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, along with his three top leutinants, will get about USD 2 million in just salaries and bonuses, but cannot work on creating a rival to the social networking giant.
This has been disclosed in Facebook's amended registration document for its upcoming IPO, filed with the US market regulator Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) last night.
As per Zuckerberg's employment agreement with Facebook, his job can be terminated "at any time for any reason or no reason", either by him or by the company.
Besides, the company's employment agreement does not allow Zuckerberg to "assist any person or entity in competing with the Company, in preparing to compete with the Company or in hiring any employees or consultants of the Company."
Similar clauses apply to Chief Operating Officer (COO) Sheryl Sandberg, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) David Ebersman and Vice President (Engineering) Mike Schroepfer, for the period these people are rendering their services to Facebook.
The agreements are silent on whether these people, including Zuckerberg, can help create a rival of Facebook after leaving the company.
In addition to in-cash salary and bonus, the pay package of the top four Facebook executives includes millions of dollars in form of stock options, performance pay and other payments.
Besides, the value of shares owned by Zuckerberg and many others at the company could also make them billionaires after the listing of Facebook, which is currently in the process of its USD five billion IPO (Initial Public Offer).
The company said that Zuckerberg, as President and CEO, would get USD 500,000 of base salary and up to 45 per cent of this amount as bonus every year. While the basic wage would be paid in two equal payments a month, he can "over-achieve" the bonus target pursuant to the company's bonus plan.
Sandberg and Ebersman would get an annual base salary of USD 300,000 each, while the same for Schroepfer would be USD 275,000. All the three executives would be entitled for a bonus payment of up to 45 per cent of their base earnings.
The collective base salary and bonus of the four executives stand at USD 1.99 million (about Rs 10 crore).
In addition to generally common no-conflict
Noting that his job at Facebook was not any specific period time, the agreement says that the employment would be on an "at will" basis, meaning that either Zuckerberg or Facebook can terminate the employment at any time for any reason or no reason.
While the job duties, title, compensation and benefits, as well as the company's personnel policies and procedures, might change from time to time, the 'at will' nature of Zuckerberg's employment can be changed only after a written agreement approved by the Facebook board.
The employment agreement of Sheryl Sandberg also carries an 'at-will' clause. Facebook has said that Sandberg's role can be adjusted from time to time, as the company was a rapidly growing and changing organisation.
However, her "duties and responsibilities always will be at least commensurate with those duties and responsibilities normally associated with and appropriate for someone in the position of COO."
Beyond her role at Facebook, she has been allowed to deliver lectures, fulfill speaking engagements and teach at educational institutions, as long as such activities do not materially interfere or conflict with her role at the company.
While Sandberg's business expenses would be reimbursed by Facebook, a similar clause is not there in the employment agreement of Zuckerberg.
Upon her termination from Facebook, Sandberg cannot poach on any of the company's employees or consultants for a period of 24 months.
As per the agreement, she cannot "either directly or indirectly solicit, induce, recruit or encourage any of the company's employees or consultants to terminate their relationship with the Company, or attempt to solicit, induce, recruit, encourage or take away employees or consultants of the company, either for myself or for any other person or entity."
Besides, she cannot use any confidential information to negatively influence any of Facebook's clients or customers, or to work in favour of any rival business.
