"Prom Queen" is a serialised mystery and will begin on April 2 and roll out over 80 days. It has been billed as "a blend of love, gossip and betrayal." The series will run on the studio's own site Vuguru.com, on a show site promqueen.tv; on YouTube, the popular video-sharing site; and on Veoh, a file-sharing site; and arrangements are being made to distribute it on wireless and handheld video devices.
Ads will run before and after episodes. Eisner also announced this week the formation of a studio, Vuguru, which will acquire and develop short videos for the Web.
User-created one-minute videos have been around ever since the dramatic drop in the price of video cameras. But what makes the Eisner move different is that he plans to have his one-minute videos "professionally produced," using top Hollywood talent.
What this will do to the movie industry that has been marching towards ever larger production budgets and ever lengthier durations and ever plusher multiplexes is too complicated to imagine. Are we going to now see the movie industry subjected to siege by the Internet folks just as the newspaper and magazine industry has been?
Those with a longer view of history will not be surprised at these developments. The movie as we know it now, a projector flashing things on a screen and a group of people watching it, was the invention in the 1890s, of the French Lumiere brothers. Up until then, movie watching was a different experience: Thomas Edison, that indefatigable American, invented his kinetograph, which shot movies, but these movies had to be viewed using another of his inventions, the kinetoscope, through a peep hole, one person at a time.
The Lumiere brothers had the brilliant idea of projecting films on a screen so that many people could view at the same time and, in addition the idea of charging for this experience. Their first screening of films to a paying public happened in 1895, at Paris's Salon Indien du Grand Café, and their first film, hold your breath, was of 45 seconds, titled Workers Leaving the Lumière Factory.
The Lumiere brothers were enthusiastic promoters of this idea and soon undertook a promotional tour of several cities in the world, including Bombay, laying the foundation for Bollywood. The repertoire of films they unveiled to a wonder-struck world included the original Workers Leaving the Lumiere Factory and a clutch of sub one-minuters with self-explanatory titles such as The Trick Horse Riders (46 seconds), Fishing for Goldfish (42 seconds), and Baby's Meal (41 seconds).
Watch these films (available free at the website www.institut-lumiere.org/francais/films/1seance/accueil.html) and you start wondering whether the current swing to the one-minute film is a mere circling back to films' origins.
What then made films bloat from their elegant 45-second origins to the current multi-hour blockbusters? Early American entrepreneurs quickly figured out that extending the early 45 seconders to longer durations immediately lengthened the queues waiting to watch them so much that these queues had to wind around whole Manhattan blocks.
The movies industry had found not only its business model but also its phrase for a successful movie -- the "blockbuster."
An early blockbuster, the longish and extravagantly produced filming of the stage version of Dante's Inferno, played for two weeks compared to the usual two days for shorter films, setting the stage for extravagant productions, which reached their peak during the time Michael Eisner ruled Disney and Hollywood.
There are several insidious trends that are eroding this tried and tested blockbuster model that Hollywood has operated with ever since. Hollywood core faithful, late-teens-to-early-twenties Americans are flocking in ever larger numbers to the broadband Internet. Armed with cheap video cameras, free editing tools and sites where they can publish their work for free, these young people are launching a revolution that has reached such tsunami-like scale. A recent study shows that two-thirds of all content viewed by these young Americans is user-generated, as opposed to professionally-produced.
Even more insidiously, the viewing occasion is also changing. Wired magazine quotes a recent study that lists the many new venues for movie watching: the 15 seconds that you are in a lift, the minutes you spend at the bus-stop waiting for your bus to arrive, the 30 minutes of the bus ride, even the five minutes you are in the loo. The one-minute movie is clearly an invention that is overdue.
The size and duration we take for granted for art forms: the short story, the novel, or the newspaper column, for instance are grounded in technological developments and human attempts to adjust to them.
Take, the last, the newspaper column. Websites of many famous newspapers are by now free-to-use - except their columnists. Because, it takes a user just about five minutes to read a column of 800-900 words, like this one, they may be signalling that this is about the bite size of time they can invest on a topic and consequently are ready to pay for.
The one-minute film movement may just be one such signal to the movie establishment.
Ajit Balakrishnan is the founder and chief executive officer, rediff.com.
Comments welcome at ajitb.rediffiland.com
ALSO READ:
