Rediff Logo
Money
Line
Channels: Astrology | Broadband | Contests | E-cards | Money | Movies | Romance | Search | Women
Partner Channels: Auctions | Health | Home & Decor | IT Education | Jobs | Matrimonial | Travel
Line
Home > Money > PTI > Report
November 2, 2001
Feedback  
  Money Matters

 -  'Investment
 -  Business Headlines
 -  Corporate Headlines
 -  Business Special
 -  Columns
 -  IPO Center
 -  Message Boards
 -  Mutual Funds
 -  Personal Finance
 -  Stocks
 -  Tutorials
 -  Search rediff

    
      


 Deals for NRIs

 CALL INDIA
 Direct Service :
 29.9¢/min
 Pre-paid Cards :
 34.9¢/min


 
 Search the Internet
         Tips
 Sites: Finance, Investment
E-Mail this report to a friend
Print this page Best Printed on  HP Laserjets

SC's restraint order on DPC to encash Rs 1.36 billion letter of credit remains

The Supreme Court on Thursday directed that its earlier interim order restraining US multinational Enron promoted Dabhol Power Company from encashing the Rs 1.36 billion letter of credit given by Maharashtra State Electricity Board would continue till further orders.

While postponing hearing on the DPC petition challenging a Bombay high court order to January 10 next year, a Bench comprising Chief Justice S P Bharucha, Justice Y K Sabharwal and Justice Arijit Passayat ordered that the court's interim order dated September 21 would continue to operate.

On September 11, DPC had invoked the LC from Canara Bank accusing the MSEB for non payment of dues but it was restrained to encash the same as partner MSEB stopped the payment by obtaining an injunction from the Bombay high court.

DPC had justified its decision to invoke the LC saying care and preservation of the entire project during the ensuing months would be jeopardised as DPC was unable to access and utilise funds available under the LC.

On August 6, the Supreme Court had stayed the arbitration proceedings initiated by the multinational and asked the Bombay high court to decide afresh whether Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission had the jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute.

DPC had challenged the June 26 order of the High Court holding that the Commission, being an expert body, had jurisdiction to hear the dispute.

The court had said that "until such time the high court finally hears and decides the writ petition filed by DPC challenging the jurisdiction of MERC, the Commission will not pass further orders on the application that has been made before it by the Maharashtra State ELectricity Board.

ALSO READ:
The Enron Saga

Back to top
(c) Copyright 2000 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

Tell us what you think of this report

ADVERTISEMENT