The message is becoming clearer: employees who fail to meaningfully integrate AI into their work risk falling behind in performance assessments.

When cybersecurity major Palo Alto Networks began integrating artificial intelligence (AI) usage into its 'performance elevation' process, it sent a clear signal to its workforce: AI is no longer optional.
The company made adoption of sanctioned AI coding agents and internal AI-driven tools an organisational priority, encouraging teams to embed them into daily workflows under strict data guardrails.
Key Points
- Palo Alto Networks has integrated AI usage into employee performance processes to encourage teams to embed AI tools in daily workflows.
- Global product, consulting, and technology firms are increasingly evaluating employees based on AI adoption and productivity gains.
- Companies are investing $4,000 to $5,000 per employee annually on AI tools, creating pressure to ensure meaningful workplace adoption.
- Accenture requires senior staff to regularly use AI tools for promotions, while IT firms push reskilling amid AI-led transformation.
- Some companies caution against making AI usage a rigid metric, emphasising productivity, quality improvements, and innovation outcomes instead.
While the shift is currently more visible among global product and consulting firms, industry executives said it might not be long before proficiency in AI tools -- and demonstrable productivity gains from them -- became a key metric even in India's $300 billion software services industry.
AI Enters Performance Evaluation Systems
"AI usage is being integrated into the performance elevation process.
We use it to encourage usage, coach teams, and share good practices to collectively increase the speed of innovation across teams," said Kunal Ruvala, senior vice president and general manager of India, Palo Alto.
"Ultimately, we evaluate the collective impact of these tools on our organisation's ability to deliver cutting-edge solutions faster, rather than measuring AI usage as an isolated individual requirement," Ruvala explained.
Companies Push AI Adoption at Work
For its India research and development centre, this shift towards sanctioned AI coding assets and internal AI-driven tools is an organisational imperative for driving productivity.
Palo Alto is not alone.
From product firms such as Intuit and Arista Networks to consulting giant Accenture, companies are increasingly factoring AI adoption into employee evaluations -- and in some cases, promotions -- as they seek measurable returns on rising investments in AI tools.
With enterprises spending an estimated $4,000 to $5,000 per employee annually on AI platforms and coding assistants, managements are under pressure to ensure widespread adoption.
The message is becoming clearer: Employees who fail to meaningfully integrate AI into their work risk falling behind in performance assessments.
Neeti Sharma, CEO of TeamLease Digital, believed the trend would take time to catch up in India.
"Not every company has an AI policy governing its usage. It is only the technology and consulting firms that are making it mandatory as they have the necessary infrastructure for it That too not at all levels but staggered."
AI Tools Linked to Promotions
Accenture, the world's largest IT services company by revenue, told senior staff that they must regularly use its AI tools if they were to be considered for promotions and leadership roles.
Associate directors and senior managers at the consultancy firm were informed that "regular adoption" of AI would be required to progress to leadership positions.
In September, Accenture outlined a restructuring strategy that said employees who are unable to reskill on AI would eventually be laid off.
TCS, India's largest IT services company, also laid off about 12,000 people earlier this financial year as it sought to become more agile in an era of AI-led business transformation.
IT Firms Reskill for AI Era
TCS CEO K Krithivasan urged the top brass of his company, at a Nasscom event last week, to build or become obsolete.
He cautioned that while the juniors were more proficient in the usage of AI, the senior management was still reading and hearing rather than creating.
Debate Over Measuring AI Usage
However, not all companies have on boarded the idea.
Questions remain on how to measure usage of tools and the benchmark against which an employee should be evaluated.
UST Global chief operating officer Gilroy Mathew said the company expected employees to use AI as a professional and not as tools for shortcuts.
While AI is relevant to performance, there is increasingly an indirect and contextual relevance to AI, which measures the outcomes such as productivity gains, quality improvement, and cycle of production and innovation.
"We respect the performance of each individual and do not treat AI usage as a standard or a mandatory performance metric at this point," Mathew stated.
"Because by measuring success of how many tools someone has used or not by superficial adoption, this is not what we want to be," he added.
Feature Presentation: Ashish Narsale/Rediff








