News APP

NewsApp (Free)

Read news as it happens
Download NewsApp

Available on  gplay

This article was first published 7 years ago
Home  » Cricket » Bhajji backs Rohit after MI captain is charged for dissent

Bhajji backs Rohit after MI captain is charged for dissent

Source: PTI
April 25, 2017 13:08 IST
Get Rediff News in your Inbox:

Rohit Sharma bats 

IMAGE: Mumbai Indians' captain Rohit Sharma in action against Rising Pune Supergiant on Monday. Photograph: BCCI

Mumbai Indians’ off-spinner Harbhajan Singh said on Tuesday that captain Rohit Sharma, who has been fined for showing dissent to the umpire, didn't misbehave with the official and was only trying to clarify rules.

Sharma was at the crease when Mumbai needed 17 off the last over to win against Rising Pune Supergiant.

After losing Hardik Pandya in the first ball, Sharma hit a six in the second but Jaydev Unadkat pushed the third delivery wide after seeing Sharma shuffle across the stumps.

Realising that the ball was veering away from the guideline for wide deliveries, Sharma left it alone. However, umpire S Ravi didn't call it a wide.

Disappointed with the decision, Sharma walked up to the umpire and protested, even as the square-leg umpire A Nand Kishore intervened.

"The ball was too far outside, to be honest, but I don't really know whether it was wide or not," Harbhajan told reporters at the post match conference.

"If both the batsman's legs move, then bowler should get the margin, but Rohit's one leg had moved and as per me it should have been a wide. But we have to move on with the umpire's decision and they played better than us and it was great game of cricket.

"He (Rohit) wanted to check what is the rule then, where he need to stand, he did not shout at the umpire and asked him why did he not call a wide, he was asking where should I stand so that it is called a wide, if they bowl so outside, the more you move, the bowler will get the margin," he explained.

"I don't know whether momentum was lost (because of the wide not being called), Rohit was hitting nicely but unfortunately he ended up hitting the ball straight in the air. That's what happens, cricket is game, anything can happen," he said.

"Just before that he hit a six and a similar ball went up in the air. I don't think momentum would have lost, at that time (you need to do) as a batter, just see and hit the ball, Rohit was batting on 50 odd, so don't think there were chances to lose the momentum," he added.

Harbhajan, however, admitted that the 19th over of their innings bowled by Englishman Ben Stokes brought Pune back into contention.

Strokes, the costliest buy of this IPL, conceded only 7 runs, and Mumbai eventually lost by three runs at the Wankhede stadium last night.

"That over was actually very crucial over for them. We didn't get any boundary in that over. That over actually changed the scenario for them, they were in the game. 17 to win (in the final over), they were in the game," Harbhajan said.

"Obviously, if one odd boundary would have been hit in that over, then we would have required 12-13 runs, then the match is open and there would have been a more pressure on the bowler," he added.

The off spinner took his 200th T20 wicket on Monday.

"It is nice to be taking those 200 wickets and still going strong. It is nice to be achieving these milestones and my job is to keep playing," said Harbhajan, who has been with Mumbai through all the 10 seasons of IPL.

Harbhajan also backed out of sorts Sri Lankan seamer Lasith Malinga. "Mali has been a champion bowler for us, not just us but if you see his record in international career, he is champion bowler.

"He has gone for couple of overs, which can happen to any bowler. He is still the number one bowler in this format, no matter whether he is playing for us or Sri Lanka.

"It was his call that he needed a break and wanted to work something out for his own bowling." 

Get Rediff News in your Inbox:
Source: PTI© Copyright 2024 PTI. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PTI content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent.

India In Australia 2024-2025