"The victim claims she was molested on December 1 and then she was raped after a week. Even after the incident of rape, she went back with Paraskar. Is it not a consensual\ act?" he said.
In her earlier statement she did not give the date of the alleged incident and it was given only in supplementary statement. "There is a spoon-feeding by the investigating team," advocate Merchant alleged.
Further, he argued that on December 7, the victim had met Paraskar at a mall from where they went to suburban Malad. "A week ago she was molested and still she goes to the mall to meet Paraskar," Merchant pointed out.
While going to Madh island off suburban Malad, she did not ask him where they were heading, the lawyer noted. "At Madh, the girl went into a bungalow with the man who had molested her a week ago."
Further, advocate Merchant said, as per the complaint, when Paraskar made advances towards her inside the bungalow, she did not shout for help or try to run away. "She has also said that she saw a bottle of liquor and Paraskar offered her but she refused and later he had it; wasn't it enough to get an idea what was going to happen?"
After the alleged rape, both came out of the bungalow together and travelled together. "This cannot be termed as rape, is it not consensual?" Merchant contended.
Mumbai: Rape accused DIG says no to polygraph test
Rape complaint against IPS officer is act of revenge: Lawyer
VOTE: Is the Centre right in keeping English out of the UPSC exams?
In UPSC row, protesters say fight isn't against English, but poor translation
Pallavi murder case: Watchman Sajjad Mogul sentenced to life