The court also cautioned parents of young couples to behave with “more sensitivity” while dealing with such issues. A bench of justices Kailash Gambhir and Sunita Gupta made the observation while upholding the life term awarded to four members of a Delhi-based girl’s family, including her father, for killing her lover as they did not approve of their relationship.
Anguished over the killing of the 24-year-old youth, the bench said young adults, especially girls, need to be more responsible and act maturely when taking important decisions like getting married or entering into a live-in relationship.
“The need of the hour is that boys and more importantly girls have to be very careful and cautious before taking such an important decision concerning their lives before entering into the most sanctimonious relationship of marriage or even to have a live-in relationship. “One of the major reasons contributing to increase in the rape cases are failure of live-in relationships or any immature decision on the part of such young adults which more often end up in a broken relationship but sometimes after indulging into physical relationships,” it said.
However, this placed an implied onus on the shoulders of the persons involved in such relationships to act responsibly and maturely, it said. Parents are “expected to behave with more sensitivity and maturity as such issues need to be resolved with patience, understanding and tolerance and instead of indifference or with a bent of mind of alienating the two”, the court said.
“It is often noticed that any impetuous act to smother such relationships often has a backlash in the form of resentful feelings or even rebellious actions. Therefore, it is with great sensitivity that the parents need to acknowledge the growing independence of their children and rationally and dispassionately deal with these emotive issues giving due respect to their feelings,” the bench added.
REVEALED: Why young Indians prefer live-in relationships
RSS frowns upon 'anti-Indian' live-in relationships
Live-in relationship, pre-marital sex are fine: SC
Live-in partner entitled to maintenance: SC
The coming battle for Pataliputra