Reacting to the apex court's removal of Sinha from the case and highly critical remarks about him, former CBI chief R K Raghvan said this is the first time that such an order has been passed by the Supreme Court against an agency chief asking him to recuse from an ongoing investigation.
"It is a distressing and an unfortunate event. I want to forget it as a bad dream. But one must remember that this is an indictment of an officer and not an organisation," he said.
Raghavan, a 1963-batch officer who had headed the agency between 1999-2001, said he does not agree with the argument that in order to get complete picture of a case, it is imperative for an agency chief to meet the accused as well.
"It is OK to meet the accused or their representative once or twice in the presence of the investigative officer in the office but certainly not the number of times at his residence as alleged," he said. Another former CBI director Joginder Singh also termed the event as ‘unfortunate’ saying Caesar's wife should be above suspicion.
"The conduct of the CBI director should not only be clean but also appear to be clean," Singh said. He said it is the first time that the apex court has come up with such scathing observations against a CBI director.
"Every act has its consequences. There is no smoke without the fire. Whatever the Supreme Court has said is absolutely correct -- that lots of allegations of credibility are against him. The Supreme Court does not pass orders lightly," he said.
39 bills to come up during Parliament's Winter Session
Chopper deal: ED files chargesheet in money laundering case
SC tells trial court to expedite riot case within 3 months
'It was a night of horror'
AAP demands CBI chief's immediate ouster