'The average annual rate of appointment of high courts judges has increased by 63 per cent.'
The average annual rate of appointment of judges in the high courts has not declined during the last two years, though no new appointments were made during April to December 2015 due to hearing of the NJAC matter, sources said.
"The Government of India has utmost respect for the judiciary and its independence," a source said, against the backdrop of Chief Justice of India T S Thakur's statement over the vacancies not being filled up.
The government, the sources said, is concerned about the increasing pendency in the judicial courts and "hence, the government has been making all out efforts to see that the vacant posts are filled up."
While the sanctioned strength in June 2014 was 906, the present government increased it to 1,079 in June this year, the sources addded.
It is being presented in the media that the number of vacancies of judges in the high courts has increased abnormally in recent times, the sources felt.
"However, an analysis of data for the last 10 years indicates that there is no such abnormal increase," the sources said.
During the last 10 years, the number of vacancies has varied from 265 to 280.
Similarly, the working strength of judges in the high courts has remained almost the same, around 600.
The current working strength in the high courts is 620, the sources said.
"Further, 173 new posts of judges were created in the last two years. This has added to the vacancies in the high courts," the sources said.
Between 2009 and 2014, only 20 new posts of high courts judges had been created, the sources stated, whereas during 2015 and 2016, 173 new posts were created.
"If we exclude that period, the average annual rate of appointment of high courts judges has increased by 63 per cent -- from 74 to 121 per year," the sources added.
The government, they said, is keen to expedite the appointment of judges and as it has explained in the court, 86 fresh appointments have been made in the high courts.
121 additional judges have been made permanent, 14 chief justices have been appointed and four chief justices transferred.
18 additional judges have been given extensions and four judges to the apex court were also appointed. Besides, 33 judges of high courts have also been transferred.
Can the judiciary also reflect please?
Turning a mirror to the judiciary
Justice for all or just another jumla?
Judicially inappropriate speech
He believed that justice is possible in an unjust world