Noting that there was an aura about her which was "difficult to explain but impossible to ignore", Mukherjee said in his new book The Coalition Years that she had built her career fearlessly and aggressively and was the "outcome of her own struggle".
"Mamata Banerjee is a born rebel," he wrote, adding that nothing illustrated this trait better than an episode in the West Bengal Congress organisational election in 1992, in which she was defeated.
He recollected how she suddenly changed her mind and demanded open elections in the party unit.
The former president recalled that after media reports said the top leaders of the West Bengal Congress, including Banerjee, wanted a consensus election to avoid an open contest that could bring out "ugly factionalism" in the party, then prime minister and Congress chief P V Narasimha Rao asked him to mediate and find a solution.
"One day, during the winter of that year, I requested Mamata Banerjee for a meeting to discuss some of the observations she had made about the process (of organisational elections).
"During the discussion, Mamata suddenly flared up and accused me along with other leaders of a conspiracy against her. She now demanded organisational election, and said she had always stood for elections so that grass-roots level workers could have their say in organisational matters," he said in the book.
Banerjee went on to accuse him and others of "distributing organisational positions" among themselves, "thereby thwarting the electoral process", he wrote.
Mukherjee said he was "flabbergasted by her reaction and wild allegations" and told her that a compromise formula was being devised at the request of the leaders, including her.
But she claimed she was totally opposed to his approach and wanted open elections, he said.
"Having said that she left the meeting in a huff. I was stunned and felt humiliated and insulted," he said.
The former president said she lost by a very narrow margin to Somen Mitra in the election for the post of the WBPCC president held through a secret ballot.
"I was present when that result was announced. An angry Mamata came up to me and asked, 'Are you happy? Has your desire to defeat me been fulfilled?' I told her that she was totally mistaken," Mukherjee recalled.
He told her he had played no role in the organisational election since she last met him.
The former Congress leader in the book also said that the evolution of Mamata Banerjee as a political leader of substance was an important episode in contemporary politics of West Bengal.
"She has built her own career -- fearlessly and aggressively -- and what she is today is the outcome of her own struggle, labour and hard work. She has an aura about her which is difficult to explain but impossible to ignore," he said.
He also said Banerjee emerged as a force to reckon with after the Kolkata plenary in 1997 as has had a spectacular political career.
Mukherjee described her victory in the 1984 Lok Sabha when she defeated Communist Party of India-Marxist's Somnath Chatterjee from Jadavpur, a constituency that was considered a citadel of the Marxist party.
"This was a splendid victory and she appeared to be truly a giant killer. Throughout her subsequent political life, she has always faced tough challenges bravely and tried to convertthem into opportunities," he said.
Why Pranab was reluctant to join UPA govt
When Pranab riled Sonia Gandhi by meeting Bal Thackeray
Pranab had reason to be upset when I became PM: Manmohan Singh
How Pranab forced UPA to withdraw ordinance on tainted lawmakers
COLUMN: How Pranab will be remembered as FM