"There was no pressure. When the comments came from the court, it appeared that the proclamation might be quashed. So, my colleague asked me that why can't you do something so that we win this case. I said that the court has to decide this. Ultimately, the decision went against the government, then President's Rule could not be imposed and re-elections were held," Bharadwaj told ANI.
“Those who want that a particular decision should come from the court, then it is wrong....It wasArjun Singh's group, everyone knows it. I met him in the Central Hall of Parliament, and he said that this case is not proceeding along expected lines. He said that I might lose my job if I do not set it right. I replied who are you to decide about my job," he added.
When asked if pressure had come from the prime minister, Bharadwaj said, "It was not in Manmohan Singh's nature to pressurise anyone."
He was referring to a 2005 Supreme Court verdict, which stopped the UPA government from imposing President's rule in Bihar when a Janata Dal (United) and Bharatiya Janata Party coalition was attempting to form a government.
The UPA government wanted the ruling to be in its favour, but the apex court thought otherwise.
Refuting the allegations, Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala told ANI, “We reject this. I have seen Bharadwaj's statement. He has made it clear that he had never pressurised the judiciary, because it was not possible to do so. The Indian National Congress respects the judiciary, we cannot even imagine pressurising the judiciary. Neither Manmohan Singh nor any of his cabinet ministers approached the judiciary for this.”
Rahul 'out of touch' with ground reality, says Congress leader
Post-poll results, will 19 Raj Bhavans be vacated?
This is not about Bofors
Maya lights up subdued 60th b'day with Mulayam fireworks
Story of Young Indian: How the Gandhis gained from share transfer