Senior counsel Ravi Kadam, appearing for the petitioner, argued that state government's notification spoke of only gutkha products and not pan masala. "There cannot be a complete ban. The ban on gutkha products has been imposed as it contains zinc, nicotine and magnesium carbonate which are injurious to health. But our pan masala products contain minimal amount of zinc which is not harmful," he argued.
Advocate General Darius Khambatta, however, opposed the petition, stating that laboratory testing of pan masala showed that it too had harmful ingredients.
Stating that the authorities had justified the ban well, the court said, "Considering public interest and safety of public health, the ban cannot be lifted."
The petition was posted for further hearing on September 12 along with other petitions filed by gutkha manufacturers.
Justifying the ban, state government had earlier said it was its duty to raise level of nutrition and standard of living of citizens.
Man from PoK an Indian, Maharashtra govt tells HC