A bench of justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya upheld the Delhi high court's order that the annual performance appraisal reports, previously known as ACRs, of a public servant were personal information and exempted from disclosure under the transparency law.
"We find no reason to interfere with the impugned judgement passed by the division bench whereby the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the high court was affirmed," the bench said.
The court passed the order on an appeal filed by transparency activist R K Jain's plea challenging high court's order.
Jain had sought setting aside of HC order and issuance of a direction to the Centre to disclose alleged ‘adverse’ remarks in ACR of Jyoti Balasundaram, a member of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in 2000-01.
Jain had earlier approached the CESTAT's central principal information officer, who had refused to "divulge any information on the ground that it was exempted under Section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act". The CIC had also declined the plea on the same ground.
RTI watchdog turns down plea on Kargil war toll
Happy birthday, Lara Dutta!
How is our info useful to you: PMO asks RTI applicant
SC to hear Sanjay Dutt's plea tomorrow
China wealth fund, Commerce Min to get new heads