In a letter that contradicts former defence minister George Fernandes' claim, A P J Abdul Kalam had opposed import of Barak missiles in 1999, months before the National Democratic Alliance government placed an order for its acquisition from Israel.
A day after Fernandes claimed that the deal was okayed by the Government in 2000 after receiving clearance from Kalam, who was the then scientific advisor to the defence minister, sources said Kalam had on June 23, 1999 written against procurement of Barak Anti-Missile Defence System.
The letter by Kalam had come in response to the then Naval Chief Admiral Sushil Kumar, who had on June 15 sought acquisition of two Barak AMDs.
Kalam, in his letter, had said the development of indigenous Trishul missile was in final stages and various systems were working properly. He had argued in favour of Trishul saying it was cost effective and would be free from problems that could arise out of foreign policy changes, they said.
On June 25, 1999, Kumar had put up a note to Fernandes favouring acquisition of Barak AMDs despite stiff opposition from Kalam, with whom he had a meeting on the same day. In 1996, when Pakistan was in the process of acquisition of missile system from abroad, Kalam, who was also Chief of Defence Research and Development Organisation, had favoured Barak Missile on condition that Navy would induct Trishul, which was expected to be ready by 2002.
However, former Navy chief Admiral Sushil Kumar, who was charged by the CBI with misusing his position to push through the Barak defence deal in 2000,
Barak makers deny charges
Arms Scandal: What the CBI says
Coverage: The Great Defence Scandal
Arms scam: Hunter and the hunted