According to WTO rules, the amount of such subsidies given by member-countries is calculated on the external reference prices of 1986-88.
The Indian government has demanded that the year be changed to a more recent period, taking into consideration the rise in food prices and rate of inflation.
“As far as breaching the 10 per cent ceiling is concerned, we are not at default and not going to be, in the next few years to come.
"If we were to account for inflation, the increase in minimum support price since 1986-88, we would be in negative as far as subsidies is concerned,” said a commerce department official who did not wish to be named.
The official also highlighted that India have never demanded elimination of the 10 per cent ceiling.
According to WTO’s Agreement on Agriculture, developing countries such as India can provide subsidies of up to 10 per cent of the total value of production of the particular products.
In India’s case it is cereals and pulses.
“India never said it wants to eliminate 10 per cent ceiling. . .We provide per capita subsidy less than $200 compared to $50,000 in US,” the official added.
As far as the ‘Peace Clause’ is
9 reasons why India's WTO veto shocked the world
Disappointment, uncertainty after India blocks WTO trade deal
At WTO, India has little choice but to fall in line
A new re-laying of India
Banking imbroglio holds up India, Singapore trade pact review