He also said that industry structure is a government responsibility ands he had seen "very little action" to change that, to take that responsibility.
"The telecom industry, if you look at it from international perspective is a mess in India ... and it seems to come from this concept which have been developed in the past the more competition the better," Pieters said at the Economist India Summit.
"The industry structure is a problem of the government because spectrum, which is our raw material is in a limited form available and if you get too many players than you get this problem where nobody has enough spectrum," he said.
Pieters said in the past also during his discussions with the government, he raised the point about industry structure but the latter termed it as competitive growth.
Citing the example of China, he said there are three players which are very profitable, offer the lowest tariffs and have a far better infrastructure. He said last year China invested $50 billion in its networks, whereas in India the figure was $5 billion.
"This industry structure is government responsibility and I think I have seen very little action to change that, to take that responsibility," he added.
Asked if there is a change in perspective since the new government has taken over, he said, "In India, the sentiment can change overnight but it doesn't mean that structurally things can change overnight...it can hopefully be after 12-18 months."
Pieters said the ICT initiatives announced by the government are not new and the National Telecom Policy 2012 was full of such concepts but the problem is how to achieve them.
"All those are all great ambitions...the problem is how do you get there. What I have seen in our industry is that the thinking is simply not there of how do you get there," he said.
Lessons from China to boost India's telecom sector
India entry may get tougher for foreign telecom firms
Amazing phablets you can buy under Rs 20,000
Assam: 3 tribal militants killed in encounter in hills