"We want to know what is the price.
"Just put it in a sealed envelope what is the amount to be paid (by the existing operators of 2G) after our order of February 2, 2012," a bench comprising justices G S Singhvi and K S Radhakrishnan said while posting the matter for hearing on February 4.
"The existing operators are allowed to continue operations till the next date of hearing," the bench further said.
The apex court on February 2 last year cancelled 122 licences for the 2G spectrum and had directed the DoT to hold fresh auction for them within four months which has been extended by interim orders from time to time.
The bench asked DoT's counsel and senior advocate P P Rao to collect information about the telecom companies which emerged as sucessful bidder in the first round of auction that took place on November 12 to 14 last year and what is going to be the proposed reserve or base price for second round of auction to be held on March 11.
It also wanted to know from the DoT as to how many operators whose licences were cancelled by it on February 2, 2012, participated in the fresh auction and how many of them continued with their operation.
"How many licencees stopped operation and secondly you have to find out what decision you have taken to fix price for future auction," the bench told Rao.
The court also said it has to be made clear whether those existing operators who did not participate in the auction would be allowed to continue or not.
During the hearing, the bench observed that the telecom operators enjoyed the benefit of its order to continue with operations till the fresh auction and they are liable to pay the reserved price after January 18, 2013.
The court also said the decision to reduce the bidding price after the first round of auction for spectrum is bound to evoke further litigation.
"The price in the first round of auction was different and now you are reducing the the price in the second round of auction (to be held on March 11) which is bound to generate litigation," the bench said but added that "we are not concerned with litigation".
Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, Centre for Public Interest Litigation, which was one of the PIL petitioners on whose plea the licences of 2G
Centre asked to respond on PIL for change in juvenile law
Tata Motors undertakes three-day block closure
Telcos seek part of CDMA spectrum for GSM services
Courts' nod for recast of Mukesh's personal firms
Telenor earmarks Rs 15,500 cr investment in India