A bench of justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai dismissed the claim of the Swiss firm for getting exclusive rights for manufacturing the cancer drug on the ground that a new substance has been used in the medicine.
The judgement, which was keenly watched by pharma companies across the world, will clear hurdles coming in the way of the manufacture of generic drugs in India for cancer patients.
While a one-month dose of Glivec costs around Rs 120,000, generic drugs, manufactured by Indian companies, for the same period are priced at Rs 8,000.
Advocate Pratibha Singh, appearing for Indian drug firms Ranbaxy and Cipla, which had opposed Novartis' plea, said that the judgement is a victory for Indian companies as they can now manufacture cheaper drugs so long as there is no patent over a medicine.
"Patents will now be granted only for genuine inventions and not on repetitive inventions.
"The Supreme Court said there was no new invention in the Novartis' drug," she said.
She also said there should be no fear that foreign firms would be affected by Monday's verdict since as long as they have genuine inventions, patents will be given to them.
In its judgement, the apex court also held that 'imatinib mesylate' used in Glivec is a known substance and Novartis can't claim patent over the drug for using this chemical.
Novartis had approached the apex court in 2009 against the order of Chennai-based Intellectual Property Appellate Board, which had rejected its claim for patent.
The multinational company had applied for patent in 2006.
Novartis' claim was opposed by Indian pharma companies, which are manufacturing generic drugs, as well as by health aid activists in the apex court.
They had claimed that the MNC is not entitled for patent and it is indulging in 'ever-greening'
Natco, Cipla up after SC dismisses Novartis plea
Indian cos garner Rs 6,000 cr through IPOs
Big Pharma waits nervously on Glivec patent verdict
RBI against super-regulator for financial firms
Three Indians who REVOLUTIONISED medicines