CBI's special public prosecutor K Surendra, who had last week began arguments before the XXI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACCM), sought to frame charges against each accused and presented before the court documents and evidence in support of the charges.
Opposing the discharge petitions of prime accused and former Chairman of Satyam Computers, B Ramalinga Raju, and nine other others, the CBI counsel explained their role in committing the Satyam fraud.
Surendra argued that the 10 accused, who have been charged with criminal conspiracy, cheating, forgery and falsification of accounts in the agency's three chargesheets, fabricated records and documents in order to cheat the investors.
Magistrate BVLN Chakravarthi, after hearing the CBI's arguments, posted the matter to September 15 to enable the defence present its case prior to framing of charges.
The magistrate also asked the CBI counsel to provide a gist copy to the defence on CBI's allegations.
Centre misusing CBI against me: Maya
Satyam scam: Raju appears before local court
State govt adjourns Karnataka legislative assembly
K T S Tulsi to represent CBI in Sohrabuddin case
Satyam case hearing on August 24