Defence Minister A K Antony on Thursday ruled out for now any change in the defence production policy to raise the Foreign Direct Investment from the existing 26 per cent to 100 per cent as suggested by the commerce ministry recently.
The defence minister said initially, there was 100 per cent monopoly of public sector undertakings in the defence sector, but that policy was changed over the last decade to first allow 100 per cent private participation and later permitting 26 per cent FDI in the defence industry.
But, the 26 per cent FDI policy notwithstanding, the defence ministry would consider allowing more than the prescribed FDI in the sector "on a case-to-case basis," he added.
"Ultimately, forever I can not rule out (higher FDI). On a case-by-case basis, we will allow more FDI in defence sector," he said.
Commerce ministry had recently brought out a discussion paper that called for allowing 100 per cent FDI in the defence sector, a demand forcefully made by foreign players who are eyeing the over USD 50 billion Indian defence spending expected over the next five years.
"Commerce ministry has brought out a discussion paper only. The commerce minister himself said it is a discussion paper. We can discuss. There is no problem. You should not think there is a clash (between the two ministries)," Antony said.
He said the annual review of the DPP was in progress and in the next round of DPP amendments, his ministry would give more emphasis on Indianisation to strengthen domestic defence industrial base.
"Not only the PSUs, we will give more space to private sector also. So by combining the resources and capacity of the PSUS and Indian private sector, we want to enhance the capacity of Indian defence sector.
This year, in the coming edition of DPP, our priority is to strengthen the Indian defence industry," he added.
Defence production policy to favour Indian firms
Profitable PSUs to divest 10 per cent equity
Govt plans to sell off 12-15 PSUs next fiscal
PSUs may have to fund CSR from net profit
Private banks: Govt may not change FDI policy