Our income tax department should bring out monthly bulletins as well as annual reports providing insights into the nature of our direct tax segments, says R Vaidyanathan.
India's income tax department does not provide any statistics about the number of tax assesses, amount of tax paid, income ranges for different categories like individuals/Hindu Undivided Family/corporates etc.
The tax department is extremely economical in giving any data pertaining to domestic tax payers not just in terms of names but even aggregates.
For instance, an important aspect is about exemption given to tax for dividend income in the hands of shareholders. There are owner shareholders who may be getting more than Rs 100 cr (Rs 1 billion) as dividend by virtue of their shareholding. We do not know how much dividend was distributed and how much individuals benefited.
Details of different ranges of dividend income and number of beneficiaries will be very useful to understand who benefits most in the system -- shareholders or salary-earners
Table 1, below, has the information available from I-T department about tax assesses in India for different categories. It reveals that there were 3.1 crore assesses in 2010-11 but it does not tell us about the amount of taxes from different categories. Instead of such detailed information, what is provided now is the aggregated numbers -- that also if some member of Parliament decides to ask.
Table 1. Category-wise Number of Income Tax Assessees in India
(2008-09 to 2010-11)
Year |
Company |
Individual |
HUF |
Firms |
Trusts |
Others |
Total |
2008-09 |
327674 |
30101260 |
768845 |
1310849 |
71145 |
70854 |
32650627 |
2009-10 |
367884 |
31384084 |
806236 |
1354330 |
76898 |
95994 |
34085426 |
2010-11 |
496872 |
31035394 |
761911 |
1229722 |
119378 |
95487 |
33739124 |
Source:
Till year 2000 the All India Income Tax Statistics used to provide detailed category-wise statistics. This publication has been discontinued. In other words, the finance ministry has become shy of providing details of the tax assessed. Anyhow, we will look at the year 2000 numbers. (See table 2 below).
It says that there were no salaried persons in the country with an income of more than Rs 1 crore, and, in all, there were around 250 people above the Rs 25-lakh annual income level. In the case of self-employed, the number is around 900, with none in the Rs 50 to 100-lakh category!
Table 2. Number of Returns, Individuals (Salaried & Non-Salaried Persons)
Range of Income Rs Lakh |
Salaried Number of Returns |
Non-Salaried Number of Returns |
25-50 |
103 |
672 |
50-100 |
155 |
NIL |
100+ |
NIL |
258 |
Source: All India Income Tax Statistics [AIITS]—Directorate of Income Tax—New Delhi—2001.
Looking at table 2, we feel that a relief fund should be created for all our top film stars, cricket players, surgeons, lawyers, chartered accountants, architects, tax consultants and other self-employed persons. They all seem to be in distress.
Of course, we get a news item like, 'The recovery of tax arrears of about Rs 91,000 crore from stud farm owner Hassan Ali Khan is not possible, the finance ministry has informed a parliamentary panel -- even after all immovable and moveable assets belonging to the group have been attached.' This is not the way a sum of nearly one per cent of our GDP is written off without adequate disclosure to the public at large.
It may be worthwhile for our finance ministry to check the web site of income tax Authorities of some of the G7 countries. They provide copious details and significant amount of insights.
Similar to RBI, India's I-T department too should bring out monthly bulletin as well as annual reports providing insights into the nature of our direct tax segments. Otherwise it will only be perceived as a corrupt and non-transparent government department.
In the context of computerisation of the I-T department, there is all the more reason they should revive the All India Income Tax Statistics and make it bigger and larger in terms of information dissemination. Ostrich-like attitude is not of much use in sharing of financial data since it will only increase distrust.
Photographs: Reuters.
R Vaidyanathan is professor (finance) at the Indian Institute of Management-Bangalore. The views expressed here are personal.
Why Narendra Modi is wrong on taxation reforms
UPA's fatal neglect of the direct taxes
G20 leaders must rein in corporate tax dodgers: Aussie PM
NC, PDP supporters clash at EC office in Kashmir
Rohit Sharma hits highest ever ODI score