As the global credit crunch wends its way across the developed world, writes Julian Phillips of the Gold Forecaster, we are seeing defensive action by some nations to lower their dependence on the United States.
The aim is to duck the recession now hitting the world's single largest economy. The future of the US in global trade has been damaged, and its currency's weakness has only provided a little defense for the nation so far.
With Europe focusing still on price stability (i.e. inflation), the weaker economies of Europe are taking the strain as the Euro rises on the currency markets. Stronger nations like Germany are doing well internationally, so they are affected far less by a strong Euro than weaker states such as Spain, Greece and Ireland.
These strains within the Eurozone are rising at the same time as strains between the US and Europe are heightened, with the Chinese dragon roaring as it awakens and many nations like Japan penetrating that new market to stem the pernicious effects of their dependence on the US.
This was reflected in the 9 per cent growth in Japanese exports last month, which saw 15 per cent growth in trade with China alone.
Gold and silver have proved to be excellent havens for Western investors seeking shelter over the last few years, moving from $275 to over $1,000 in gold and from $4 to $22 in silver, with much more to come in time, we believe.
But are they still enough, or is now the time to broaden one's thinking, extending one's Gold Investment and other financial arrangements to take advantage of the coming storm?
New Government Controls on the Way?
Frequently we have pointed to the coming imposition controls on capital flows that these long-term changes will inspire. This last week has seen what appears to be a long-term plan to create an environment where controls both inside and outside the US can be imposed.
This environment has been established long ago in the more socialist reaches of the global economy with the huge powers vested in other nation's central banks. The plan by Secretary Paulson is long-term and will not be seen on our screens until next year. It will come under a new government, too. But the wheels have begun to turn in the process.
Right now there is no doubt in our minds that should the Fed want to impose any particular control over any particular market, it would have the backing of government. These controls are primarily aimed at internal capital controls, but to effectively control capital there is often a separation of trade capital from investment capital of all kinds internationally.
What is deeply significant in these plans -- and in the plans of the G-7 nations agreering to "calm irrational market moves" when necessary -- is the belief that it is proper to be able to impose a will on financial markets that meets government requirements and not those of the individual. By definition this implies a diminishing of the freedom of financial markets and their inhabitants.
The very tone of such global moves to control markets has changed to permit a far greater degree of governmental control, no matter which way one looks at it. On the good side this will lead to markets looking healthy despite the unseen props holding them up.
And why not; the good of the nation stands above that of its individual citizens, correct?
This is accepted in most nations of the world where a considerably higher degree of government presence in the activities of the individual has been the case throughout our lives. Such controls, while restricting individuals tremendously can benefit markets too.
In Europe and the United States, the impression persists that any such control is for the benefit of the individual and the financial markets. The moves now being made both inside the US and outside are changing this climate to one where the government interests are being given greater space than previously seen, justified by the (apparently)