|
Excise duty raised on iron and steel from 8% to 12%. |
|
Customs duty has been reduced from 15% to 10% on all primary, semi-finished and finished forms of iron and steel like ingots and billets, sponge iron, hot rolled and cold rolled bars/rods/coils of non-alloy steel (other than seconds and defectives). |
|
Customs duty reduced from 20% to 15% on ferro alloys, stainless steel and other alloy steel, excluding seconds and defectives. |
|
The budget is silent on the restoration of the duty entitlement pass book (DEPB) scheme applicable to steel exporters. |
|
A surcharge of 2% on account of education cess will be imposed on corporate tax. |
|
The budget announcements are a negative for the steel sector, as the increase in the excise duty by 4% to 12% will adversely affect the bottomline, at least in the short term. |
|
Further, the reduction in customs duties on certain steel products by 5% to 15% will exert pressure on the steel companies' intentions of raising prices. However, in the near-term, with international prices ruling firm, reduction in domestic prices may not be necessary. |
|
Further, with no announcements made with respect to the restoration of the DEPB scheme, which the industry had expected, it has come as a setback of sorts for steel players (particularly with respect to exports). |
|
The imposition of the 2% surcharge in the form of education cess is a negative for the bottomline of corporates. |
|
We continue to maintain our bearish view on the steel sector for the medium-term owing to various reasons. We believe that the steel cycle has peaked and with various domestic and global capacity expansions plans taking shape coupled with the Chinese governments efforts at cooling down its economy, this would put pressure on steel prices going forward. Indian steel majors have already announced aggressive capacity expansion plans in India. This means that any shortfall in the demand from China will lead to overcapacity in the Indian context. While steel demand in India is expected to grow in the region of 4% to 5% in the near future, it may not be able to absorb the capacity additions expected in the future. |
|
Tisco - Mr. Nandrajog (VP - Finance) (excerpts from a detailed pre-budget wish-list provided by the company)
|
|
Export benefits: DEPB benefit on exports should be restated. Further, Export promotion for Capital Goods (EPCG) Scheme is an incentive for exporters. The system need to be simplified on similar lines as DEPB Scheme. It will help faster processing of documents and release of goods at the Ports. |
|
Value Added Tax (VAT): Implementation of "Value Added Tax" (VAT) with corresponding reduction in Central Sales Tax (CST), as envisaged in the proposal, needs priority. This will also mean abolition of Entry Tax (4% - 5% on designated input materials) which many states, including Jharkhand, have imposed. |
|
Reduction in Railway Freight: Inspite of good quality of limestone available in the Country especially Rajasthan, the landed cost of limestone become uneconomical compared to the imported ones. This is mainly due to very high railway freight (almost 300% of the cost of material) paid for the rail movement. This makes the entire deal uneconomical. We therefore, seek support of Indian Railways and assistance from Ministry of Steel, to cut down the railway freight to make the indigenous limestone economically attractive. |
|
Tariff protection: In view of the high infrastructure costs and high interest rates, tariffs have to be commensurate, to make the Indian steel industry competitive. Tariffs need to be in place so long as infrastructure development remains inadequate in the country. It may be noted that countries, which have reduced tariffs, have alongside provided safeguards to prevent unhealthy competition from cheap imports. The Chinese market, which has mainly been behind the current revival of the world steel industry, is showing signs of slowing down. There is an apprehension that this may drastically affect world steel prices in future. In view of the foregoing, it is strongly recommended that customs duty may be maintained at the current level upto March 2006. |
Budget 2001-02 |
|
Budget 2002-03 |
|
Budget 2003-04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Surcharge on customs duty reduced.
Steel purchased for Gujarat relief work to be exempt from Excise duty.
Higher outlay on infrastructure projects. |
|
Custom duty on seconds and defective (on hot rolled coils) increased to 40% from the earlier 35%.
Custom duty on ship breaking scrap increased to 15% from the current 5%. CVD (counter veiling duty of 16%) and SAD (special additional duty) are exempted.
Custom duty on graphite electrode of size above 24'" reduced to 15% from the earlier 25%. Custom duty on refractory raw material (micro silica/fume silica) reduced to 25% from the earlier 35%. |
|
Finance minister reaffirmed the thrust on infrastructure development by announcing new infrastructure projects.
Peak customs duty reduced from 30% to 25%.
Decrease in freight rate by 5.3%. Confessional freight for short distance transportation.
Tax sops maintained for the housing sector.
Surcharge on corporate tax halved from the current 5% to 2.5%. |
[Read more on Budget 2001-02] |
|
[Read more on Budget 2002-03] |
|
[Read more on Budget 2003-04] |
|
Key Positives |
|
|
The per capita steel consumption in India is abysmally low at around 30 kgs as compared to 180 kgs of China and over 400 kgs in the developed countries. This wide gap in relative steel consumption indicates that the potential ahead for India to raise its steel consumption is high. |
|
Meteoric rise in steel prices during 2003 helped the domestic steel companies immensely as many of them managed to reduce their debt burden considerably, helping them either turn into profits or increase the same significantly. Going forward, the demand is likely to sustain in the current year also on the back of continuing demand from countries like China and improving growth prospects of US and Japan. |
|
A robust housing and infrastructure sector, with growth potential in the auto and the consumer durables sectors is likely to be a big positive for the domestic steel sector. |
|
Indian steel producers are one of the lowest cost producers in the world, which provides them a hedge against fall in prices. Further, relatively efficient and vertically integrated companies like Tisco are likely to be in a better position to weather any steel downturn. | |
|
Key Negatives |
|
|
While there have been concerted efforts to reduce the overcapacity constraints in the industry, the problem continues to persist, albeit lesser than a year or two ago. Further, the biggest threat to the industry remains from the cyclicality of the sector, which could put immense pressure on steel prices if steel demand/consumption shows signs of faltering. |
|
Indian steel companies have to bear additional costs pertaining to capital equipment, power and inefficiencies (low per employee productivity). This has capped the edge they would have otherwise enjoyed due to availability of cheap labour and raw materials. |
|
Another possible threat to the domestic steel sector continues to be from dumping by international companies. With wide spread capacity expansions taking place across the globe and the protection to domestic steel companies being progressively reduced with consistent reduction in custom duties, international steel companies might look at markets to dump their products. In such a scenario, Indian companies stand to lose due to lack of competition in terms of size | |