What surprised me most was the manner in which the Indians went down to the Aussies, particularly after having beaten them only a few months back. It was a pathetic display and there was no concerted effort to fightback. They seemed a totally demoralised lost.
| |||||||||||
The Indian fowards -- Dhanraj Pillay, Baljit Singh Dhillon, Gagan Ajit Singh, Prabhjot Singh and Deepak Thakur -- failed to play with any concrete plan and at no point of the game did the Indians trouble the Aussie defenders. This enhanced the confidence of the Aussie defenders and I thought coach Rajinder Singh could have tried a different combination in the frontline to galvanise the team.
It is an open secret that the Australians play an 'open game' against all their opponents. But they play with speed and they counter attack very effectively. In this system of play, I fail to understand why our forwardline did not combine with their wing halves by using the width of the ground. This could have troubled the Aussie defenders.
The inconsistent display from the forwards may worry the team management in their next two games against Argentina and Pakistan. With our forwards failing to break through, the midfielders should have taken the added responsibility.
Playing against Australia, the midfielders can perform well since there will be a lot of space in between the 50 yards line. But the midfielders could not produce any outstanding hockey, except for Baljit Singh Saini, and that contributed to India's defeat.
If the forwards and midfielders fail to play their usual game, the Indians will have a tough time in the remaining matches of this prestigious championship.
The Indians made too many mistakes in such an important match. When the forward line is not functioning in full steam, it is the duty of the midfielders and defenders to support them and not gift away the goals to the opponents.
When the Australians scored the second goal in the 44th minute, nearly 26 minutes were still left for the Indians to fight back, but from their performance it looked they had already given up.
There was no sense of anguish to fight the rest of the game. Even when Dilip Tirkey reduced the margin to 1-3, there were 20 minutes left for the team to bounce back, but they just could not do it. If they could do it against Germany by scoring two goals in two minutes, why could they not show a more determined effort?
The Indians have to find a solution to all their problems. They have to get the focus back and show what they are capable of in the remaining matches.
Going by the performance of the Australians in earlier matches, I thought they would be under pressure against India. Their deep defenders and midfielders had played below par and conceded nine goals in the first two matches. I thought the Indians would be able to exploit their lack of form.
But it turned out to be a different story in the end. The Aussies played some aggressive hockey from the frontline supported by the midfielders. The frontline moved with a lot of purpose and pierced into the Indian defence freely and looked very confident.
They attacked from both the wings and their main schemer Troy Elder was excellent in all his passes inside the 25-yard line. He was easily the star of the Australian victory though Grant Schubert scored three goals.
Goalkeeper Chauhan is having a good tournament and the margin of defeat could have been much bigger if not for his outstanding performance.