NPS Vs PPF Vs EPF: And The Winner Is...

Isn't the goal of retirement planning to create a balanced portfolio that aligns with your financial goals, rather than chasing returns blindly, asks Ramalingam Kalirajan

Is comparing NPS, PPF, and EPF really the best approach to securing your retirement? Many people attempt to evaluate these options head-to-head, trying to decide which is 'better.' But is this comparison even meaningful?

Before diving into such futile exercises, shouldn't we first ask ourselves what each of these products truly represents?

NPS, PPF, and EPF serve distinct purposes, are built on different underlying assets, and offer unique features.

So, instead of blindly judging which one is 'best,' wouldn't it make more sense to understand how they fit into your overall retirement strategy?

When planning for your golden years, the real question is: How can these options complement each other to secure a well-diversified and reliable retirement portfolio?

NPS vs PPF vs EPF: Which is Truly Better for Retirement?

Is comparing NPS, PPF, and EPF the right way to approach retirement planning? Unfortunately, such comparisons are often oversimplified and focus solely on returns. Isn't this a narrow view that ignores the bigger picture?

NPS is a combination of equity and debt, offering market-linked returns, while PPF and EPF are pure debt products. Each serves a distinct purpose in retirement planning, with different tax implications, risks, and liquidity rules.

These comparisons, frequently seen on social media, often fail to consider a critical factor: The underlying asset classes these products belong to. Can a product designed to provide fixed returns really be compared to one focused on market-linked growth?

Instead of falling into the trap of return-based comparisons, wouldn't it be wiser to first understand the unique features and purpose of each product?

After all, isn't the goal of retirement planning to create a balanced portfolio that aligns with your financial goals, rather than chasing returns blindly?

1. Asset Class

Is it fair to compare NPS, a mix of equity and debt (and possibly alternative investments, depending on your choice), with pure debt products like PPF and EPF? Wouldn't such a comparison overlook the fundamental difference in asset classes?

Unlike NPS, which offers a blend of market-linked growth and stability, PPF and EPF are entirely debt-oriented. Doesn't this make comparing them without understanding their distinct purposes a flawed approach?

Each asset class has a unique role in building a well-rounded portfolio. So, instead of judging these products solely on returns, shouldn't we first consider the asset class they represent?

Only then can we make an informed decision about how they fit into our overall financial strategy.

2. Risk: Are You Aware of the Nuances?

When it comes to NPS, did you know that the risk isn't limited only to the equity portion?

NPS carries higher risk due to its market-linked nature, with both equity and debt components. PPF offers fixed returns with quarterly revisions, and EPF offers annual returns based on government decisions, presenting lower risk compared to NPS.

Now, consider PPF. Its interest rate is revised quarterly. Doesn't this introduce a unique type of risk, different from NPS? Similarly, EPF rates are declared annually by the government.

While these depend on inflation and economic factors, doesn't this risk feel more predictable compared to NPS?

In the case of NPS, where bonds (corporate or government) dominate the debt portfolio, they are exposed to bond market risks. But can the same be said for EPF and PPF?

The absence of bond market risk in these products makes their risk profile much lower than NPS. So, doesn't it make sense to evaluate these risks individually instead of treating them as one-size-fits-all?

3. Taxation: Are You Aware of the Differences?

In NPS, 60 per cent of the corpus is tax-free at retirement, but the remaining 40 per cent must be used for an annuity, and the annuity income is taxable. Did you know that?

On the other hand, both PPF and EPF offer tax-free maturity. For EPF, this applies if you've completed five years of service and your annual contribution stays within Rs 250,000.

Plus, the interest earned during the tenure is also tax-free in both. Isn't that a significant tax advantage?

4. Features: Are You Evaluating NPS, EPF, and PPF the Right Way?

While both NPS and EPF are designed for retirement, don't they have distinct features that cater to different needs? PPF, on the other hand, can serve not just for retirement but for any long-term goal, typically those extending beyond 15 years.

When it comes to liquidity, aren't the rules for each of these products different? So, can we really compare them and determine which is 'best' without considering the specific features and purposes they serve?

NPS, PPF and EPF each have unique features. NPS includes both equity and debt, offering higher growth potential, while PPF and EPF are safer, debt-based options. Understanding how each fits into your overall portfolio is key.

Finally

Are you looking at retirement products the right way?

After evaluating the key factors, isn't it clear that comparing NPS, PPF, and EPF based on returns or taxation is not the best approach? Each product has its own purpose, features, asset classes, and risks.

Instead of focusing solely on these aspects, shouldn't you analyse the risks involved and understand where each product fits into your overall retirement strategy?

Consider EPF and PPF as pure debt options within your retirement portfolio, while treating the equity and debt components of NPS as distinct parts of your retirement planning. This approach would lead to better long-term balanced financial security.

Ramalingam K, an MBA in Finance, is a Certified Financial Planner. He is the Director and Chief Financial Planner at holisticinvestment, a leading financial planning and wealth management company

Disclaimer: This article is meant for information purposes only. This article and information do not constitute a distribution, an endorsement, an investment advice, an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities/schemes or any other financial products/investment products mentioned in this article to influence the opinion or behaviour of the investors/recipients.

Any use of the information/any investment and investment related decisions of the investors/recipients are at their sole discretion and risk. Any advice herein is made on a general basis and does not take into account the specific investment objectives of the specific person or group of persons. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.