A new research has found something positive about celebrity journalism amid the plethora of negatives reviews.
Researchers from Missouri University have found that celebrity journalism is often discounted due to its sensationalism and lack of news value, but it may be an under-appreciated way to communicate health messages.
Amanda Hinnant, assistant professor of magazine journalism in the University of Missouri School of Journalism with co-author Elizabeth Hendrickson from the University of Tennessee, utilised focus groups that discussed various celebrity health news stories and how each story affected the participants. Two such cases in point are late Big Brother participant Jade Goody's struggle with cervical cancer and Michael Douglas' current fight against cancer of the throat.
Previous research had indicated that after a person read a health news story, they would then seek out interpersonal advice from a friend or family member before deciding to change their health behaviours.
"Based on the discussion of participants, we observed that it is possible for celebrities to serve as surrogate interpersonal contacts for people. Therefore, it would be less likely for a consumer of celebrity media to check with a friend or family member before changing a health behaviour based on a mass-mediated
Women in red are like aphrodisiacs to men
50% of readers spend more than 25K on a cellphone!
Bosses 'rarely believe staff who call in sick'
50 million Indians diabetic: Make sure you're not
What's the best day to have sex?