Sebi directs freezing of all demat accounts not linked to Aadhaar by December 31
Illustration: Uttam Ghosh/Rediff.com
It is not just domestic investors but also foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) who are grappling with the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (Sebi’s) diktat mandating linking Aadhaar with “all demat accounts”.
In August, Sebi had directed the stock exchanges to cease the accounts of all the clients who failed to submit Aadhaar details by December 31.
“FPIs, through their custodians, have written to Sebi, seeking clarity on the Aadhaar issue. The instructions issued by Sebi in this regard are not clear. We want the regulator to provide explicit exemptions so that there are no last-minute surprises,” said a source who has a direct knowledge of the development.
Aadhaar is a unique-identity number issued to all Indian residents based on their biometric and demographic data.
While Aadhaar can’t be issued to institutions, the unique-identity numbers of the “authorised signatory” who operate the accounts need to be quoted.
Sources said Sebi was gathering market feedback on the issue and could provide the custodians more clarification.
Meanwhile, Sebi is keeping a tab on the developments in the Supreme Court, where the constitutional validity of Aadhaar is being challenged, the source added.
Citibank, JP Morgan, HSBC, and BNP Paribas are the top custodians who handle FPI accounts. Some of them have written to Sebi on the matter.
“Although FPIs have not been given any specific exemptions, I think there is no need to panic as there are enough legal safeguards available.
However, a clarification from Sebi in this context would be welcome because it would address the concerns of the foreign funds,” said Rajesh Gandhi, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells.
The biggest fear of FPIs is that lack of clarity could leave room for adverse interpretations as previously seen in issues like the minimum alternate tax (MAT) and General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR).
In the event of Sebi not providing timely clarity, overseas funds would stare at physical hurdles linking Aadhaar.
Typically, some FPIs operate their trading accounts directly while some authorise a local depository participant (DP) to manage their funds.
In the first scenario, authorised signatories are based out of an off-shore location such as Singapore or Hong Kong. According to the Aadhaar Act, 2016, only Indian residents are authorised to get an Aadhaar number.
In the case of accounts managed by DPs, FPIs are concerned about information privacy, said a source.
“Sebi should make some specific exceptions keeping in mind various practical hurdles. Unlike the western markets, where brokers hold the securities on behalf of owners, in India the shares reside with the actual owner.
In the case of FPIs, Sebi has also amended several regulations and now has access to details of end beneficiaries.
Hence, the amount of value add derived by linking Aadhaar with demat accounts is limited,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder, Finsec Advisors.
In recent years, Sebi has increased the know your customer (KYC) requirements for overseas investors to prevent money laundering. Experts say further tightening may not be required.
“Sebi already has access to information of all foreign portfolio investor transactions through the stock exchanges and custodians.
Further, there is a strong KYC documentation in place and their demat accounts are already linked with the PAN number.
I think the current system is transparent enough and asking them for Aadhaar could be an undue burden on them,” said Sudhir Bassi, partner, Khaitan & Co.
| Aadhaar-linkage diktat burdens AMCs |
|
Asset management companies (AMCs) are feeling the burden of the Association of Mutual Funds in India’s (Amfi’s) decision to make the Aadhaar citizen identification mandatory for investment. From January 1, Aadhaar details of customers, including existing ones, are to be mandatory for investment in MFs. Insiders told Business Standard this was an order to Amfi from the Union ministry of finance. "We just passed this on as an official communication to members," said an Amfi board member. He added no AMC was in favour, as this puts the onus on them to link Aadhaar. Most top officials preferred anonymity, as they did not want to be quoted against the new rules of the game. Swarup Mohanty, chief executive officer (CEO) of Mirae Asset, says, "The task of getting all investors to list their Aadhaar number with us is big. Failing which, the folios would enter into a freeze zone and no transactions would be allowed. We have started the process from this month and are already seeing a fair number of upgradation. So, by December, we are hopeful that the bulk of our folios would get Aadhaar details listed." What has irked officials the most is the responsibility imposed on fund houses to adhere to the new norms. More so as in the past few years, there have been numerous changes in the Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements for investors. "We have no problem if Aadhaar is linked with investors' accounts. But, asking us to ensure this, for all the existing clientele as well, is not easy. Then, what's the use of a central KYC when individually every financial sector has to do it time and again," questioned a CEO of a large fund house. He says there were other ways to implement this. As almost all money which flows into MFs through banking channels and customers are already linking their Aadhaar details with banks, it would have been better if the data could be sourced from the banks or the central KYC agency, he suggested. Several fund houses are not limited to urban centres - they have been penetrating elsewhere, too. Investors in urban centres are more likely to update the required details in time, unlike those in rural and semi-rural territories. "Investors could face inconvenience as accounts without Aadhaar linkage will get frozen. This way, we are forced to deny investors from being able to withdraw their own money when in need until Aadhaar is linked," says a top MF official. Distributors, individual financial advisors, registrar agents like Karvy and CAMS, and fund houses' own offices would have to be massively engaged in the process to get the job done on time. Sector executives put the individual number of investors in mutual funds at about 10 million. The folio counts is over 60 million, while systematic investment plan accounts are 16.6 mn. |
Can Modi 'develop' India by 2022?
How IT services cos are fighting shrinking client budgets
Banks prefer sectoral guidelines for sale of stressed assets
Will Samvat 2074 be good, bad or ugly?
Thank God for DeMo, GST!