'Equities are not cheap; I need to buy at levels I am not comfortable with; I need to 'create' a rationale about some stocks we are buying into; we have no clue about the prospective earnings of sectors or companies; most of our 'buy' reports are based on a nebulous understanding of the future; on most occasions the profits we project do not materialise.'
Mudar Patherya on the fund manager's dilemma.
Illustration: Dominic Xavier/Rediff.com
Dear mom,
I am writing because I may need another job.
I may need another job not because equity investing is out of fashion.
I may need another job precisely because the markets are doing better than ever, mutual fund inflows have climbed to a new high and there is a greater need for fund managers with every passing day.
The reason why I wish to quit, or let me replace this with a less dramatic 'I need a sabbatical, is that I am passing through an ethical challenge.
I succeeded over the years because I worked with a clear definition of value: If something was below a P/E (price-to-earnings) of five based on current year earnings, then it was considered safe to buy.
My success was based on the ability to narrow my decision to a specific kind of company available at a nascent point in its growth phase around a relatively low PE, an approach that generally worked.
Something happened in the third quarter of the last financial year that transformed everything.
Demonetisation transformed equity investing into a broader public movement; more people moved their cash to mainstream equity investing inspired by no tax on long-term capital gains, coupled with the advantage of directly playing the India growth story.
The result: Recent MF inflows through the SIP route have been staggering.
If I had been a portfolio manager, I could have selected to stay in cash validated by experience and logic; because I am an MF executive with a mandate to immediately invest in equities, my job is to invest regardless of valuations.
These then are my challenges: Equities are not cheap; I need to buy at levels I am not comfortable with; I need to 'create' a rationale about some stocks we are buying into; we have no clue about the prospective earnings of sectors or companies; most of our 'buy' reports are based on a nebulous understanding of the future; on most occasions the profits we project do not materialise.
I am also evolving from a low-PE DNA to a mid-to-high PE pedigree.
I am compromising what I held as sacred; for years, the eleventh commandment was Thou shalt not over-pay, whereas now I am re-inscribing the tablet with Thou shalt not question.
The result is that even as much of my work appears to be brilliant in a bull market, the reality is that I have done little except to stay put on the ship, which is the basis for more money to come in, making the well-process increasingly expensive, which yet again makes my work appear perpetually outstanding.
I am collecting bonus after bonus whereas the real 'hero' of this short-term outperformance is the investor providing unprecedented quantities of long-term capital.
My training dictates that I cash my holdings; the fund stipulates that I stay invested and create bigger stories that bring in more cash.
If I can't exit my investments, then it might be better to exit the game itself.
I thought I would tell you what's going through my mind.
Your ever-questioning daughter.
Mudar Patherya is a stock market writer, tracking corporate earnings and investor psychology to gauge where markets are not headed.
Don't expect high returns from the stock market
Dream run continues for MFs
Don't buy PE-backed stocks blindly
The most important lesson for SIP investors
Should you swap your FD for stock market bet?